Active Users:1692 Time:23/09/2026 09:52:41 AM
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM
If Graendal died - and IMO there are no convincing reasons to believe otherwise - she wasn't Asmo's killer.

But the simply reason is then, that Graendal certainly won't have another PoV, and it makes not much sense to let another character than the killer reveal who murdered Asmo. Also RJ said in an interview that, if he will reveal it in the books, the killer will probably think about killing Asmo in the own PoV. This simply makes the most sense to create a powerful revelation scene to the most discussed mystery in the whole series. I see no reason why BS should do it in the less probable way. Since Graendal had the chance to reveal it in her last PoV in TGS (and in her several poV before..), but didn't do it, it follows that she most likely wasn't the killer (of course, the Graendaldunnit theory was anyway always very tenuous, if you really look into the mystery of Asmo's death).

Graendal might have sent Slayer, though (she or Lanfear, most likely).


How much stock do you put in RJ's musing during an interview about what he would "probably" do? It's not like he left notes for the next author that declare "Asmo's killer must think about the murder in their own POV". What you're talking about is Jordan's original intention of what he might do.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2085 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 1020 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1067 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 539 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1069 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1062 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1111 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1089 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1027 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 936 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 901 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 963 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 940 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 948 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 901 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 979 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 929 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 978 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 948 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 922 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 967 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 970 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 982 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1067 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1044 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 970 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 928 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 974 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 1014 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 881 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 855 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 909 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 966 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 483 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 1007 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 475 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 883 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 934 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 474 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 968 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 886 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 939 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 915 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 937 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 454 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 406 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 939 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 924 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 866 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 914 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 473 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 895 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 443 Views

Reply to Message