Active Users:373 Time:01/05/2025 08:17:03 PM
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM
If Graendal died - and IMO there are no convincing reasons to believe otherwise - she wasn't Asmo's killer.

But the simply reason is then, that Graendal certainly won't have another PoV, and it makes not much sense to let another character than the killer reveal who murdered Asmo. Also RJ said in an interview that, if he will reveal it in the books, the killer will probably think about killing Asmo in the own PoV. This simply makes the most sense to create a powerful revelation scene to the most discussed mystery in the whole series. I see no reason why BS should do it in the less probable way. Since Graendal had the chance to reveal it in her last PoV in TGS (and in her several poV before..), but didn't do it, it follows that she most likely wasn't the killer (of course, the Graendaldunnit theory was anyway always very tenuous, if you really look into the mystery of Asmo's death).

Graendal might have sent Slayer, though (she or Lanfear, most likely).


How much stock do you put in RJ's musing during an interview about what he would "probably" do? It's not like he left notes for the next author that declare "Asmo's killer must think about the murder in their own POV". What you're talking about is Jordan's original intention of what he might do.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1751 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 726 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 794 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 375 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 716 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 732 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 845 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 800 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 747 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 633 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 646 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 666 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 666 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 677 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 631 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 710 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 656 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 669 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 654 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 634 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 693 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 658 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 670 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 752 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 706 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 711 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 628 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 667 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 710 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 571 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 568 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 622 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 679 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 347 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 702 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 333 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 601 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 651 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 327 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 664 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 591 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 681 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 629 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 634 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 303 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 284 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 645 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 636 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 585 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 618 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 328 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 600 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 277 Views

Reply to Message