Active Users:595 Time:03/08/2025 08:07:30 PM
NO! fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

If she is dead, she cannot comment later anyway, barring her resurrection by the DO.
But that means squat for ToM. A lot of it will focus on timelines before Graendal's death. We may see her PoV then.

More importantly, someone else may reveal that she killed Asmodean.

3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)

WRONG. There are other ways to implicate her. Her own PoV or someone else's.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1806 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 759 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 833 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 395 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 772 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 765 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 880 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 835 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 780 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 668 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 682 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 700 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 699 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 708 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 662 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 751 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 696 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 704 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 697 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 665 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 724 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 691 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 705 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 784 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 745 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 745 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 662 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 704 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 742 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 606 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 606 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 654 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 716 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 368 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 758 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 352 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 634 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 684 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 346 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 700 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 628 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 715 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 665 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 677 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 323 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 300 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 673 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 674 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 620 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 663 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 348 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 631 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 300 Views

Reply to Message