Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
Nope... that would touch on who killed Asmodean, by touching on who DIDN'T kill Asmodean. =P
Graendal doesn't need to be the agent of revelation to be the agent of Asmodean's death. And unless I'm missing something hidden in the millions of comments above or below... Sanderson never said someone would reveal THEMSELVES as Asmodean's killer. It's far more likely that a third party would reveal the information, to be honest.
If you take that as an ironclad guarantee, then yes, Logain has a point; but of course all the people disagreeing with him don't take it as an ironclad guarantee, and I for one don't think it was ever meant to be (although I imagine Jordan would've been amused by the argument if he'd gotten to read it). It's not his logic that is off so much as his basic premise.
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM
1780 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM
734 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM*
- 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM
379 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM
740 Views
It eliminates for the following
- 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM
742 Views
That's quite a leap of logic...
- 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM
857 Views
I can't follow your logic
- 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
642 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic.
- 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
681 Views
your interpretation is wrong
- 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM
704 Views
I generally agree...
- 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM
762 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
677 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
615 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM
681 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
- 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
691 Views
This logic is lacking as well
- 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM
719 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
691 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM*
- 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM
358 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired?
- 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
605 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired!
- 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM
725 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM*
- 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM
342 Views
What? Did you double post?
- 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM
612 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process 
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
323 Views
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
323 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible
- 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
664 Views
I don't say it's impossible...
- 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
674 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM
339 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back.
- 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM
638 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite
- 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM
653 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
- 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
611 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM*
- 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM
324 Views