Active Users:337 Time:17/06/2025 12:23:36 PM
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
I will follow your conditions and prove that Graendal CAN STILL REVEAL HERSELF TO BE THE KILLER!
There are several ways to do this.
1a: Off scene. Graendal talks to Cyndane and says I killed Asmo. Sometime later Cyndane says "Graendal said she killed Asmo" bingo.
1b: Same scenario but a bit different, Flash back to Cyndane meeting with Graendal. Graendal says "I have killed Asmo".
2: Even more likely in my opinion is that tGS and ToM have parallel timelines for a while. This is extremely likely in my opinion there are many things that need to be explained that have already happened (Galad meeting Perrin, Mat in Caemlyn). It would make perfect sense to have ToM cover some of the same time as tGS. In the some time frame (before Granny gets it) we see and hear Graendal saying "I killed asmo"

NaCl(many many different ways for that to happen)H2O +<img class=' />


But I find it likely, and not ridiculous.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1780 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 734 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 811 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 379 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 740 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 742 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 857 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 810 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 754 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 641 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 659 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 678 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 678 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 685 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 642 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 723 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 670 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 681 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 671 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 645 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 704 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 672 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 682 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 762 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 720 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 719 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 639 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 677 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 719 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 581 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 580 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 636 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 690 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 358 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 725 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 342 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 612 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 664 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 333 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 674 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 605 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 692 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 638 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 654 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 309 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 288 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 653 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 647 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 598 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 637 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 337 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 610 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 284 Views

Reply to Message