Active Users:818 Time:01/02/2026 06:26:02 AM
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
I will follow your conditions and prove that Graendal CAN STILL REVEAL HERSELF TO BE THE KILLER!
There are several ways to do this.
1a: Off scene. Graendal talks to Cyndane and says I killed Asmo. Sometime later Cyndane says "Graendal said she killed Asmo" bingo.
1b: Same scenario but a bit different, Flash back to Cyndane meeting with Graendal. Graendal says "I have killed Asmo".
2: Even more likely in my opinion is that tGS and ToM have parallel timelines for a while. This is extremely likely in my opinion there are many things that need to be explained that have already happened (Galad meeting Perrin, Mat in Caemlyn). It would make perfect sense to have ToM cover some of the same time as tGS. In the some time frame (before Granny gets it) we see and hear Graendal saying "I killed asmo"

NaCl(many many different ways for that to happen)H2O +<img class=' />


But I find it likely, and not ridiculous.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1916 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 860 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 934 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 461 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 912 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 909 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 976 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 956 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 894 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 792 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 781 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 806 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 803 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 810 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 750 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 842 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 798 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 828 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 800 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 768 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 817 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 818 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 834 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 893 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 865 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 834 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 765 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 833 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 876 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 733 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 706 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 767 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 818 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 421 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 858 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 407 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 737 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 785 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 407 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 820 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 732 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 805 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 774 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 777 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 380 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 342 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 796 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 795 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 727 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 773 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 407 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 756 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 366 Views

Reply to Message