Active Users:395 Time:01/05/2025 04:35:28 AM
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM
I approve. =) I still think my comments made more sense than you gave them credit, but I accept your argument as better logic than mine. Well done... I think we can safely lay Asmodean reincarnation/reappearance aside as a possibility.


Absolutely your comments made sense and I apologize if I implied otherwise. I just wanted to show that the math eliminated the possibility no matter how strong the Choeden Kal was because of the number of people. Actually, since many of us are new Brandon Sanderson readers, it is a good idea to parse his words because we DON'T know if he is one of those authors who likes to play Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1748 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 723 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 793 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 374 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 713 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 732 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 842 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 799 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 743 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 631 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 646 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 663 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 663 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 675 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 630 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 710 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 656 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 668 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 654 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 633 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 690 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 657 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 670 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 752 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 704 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 708 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 627 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 666 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 707 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 570 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 568 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 622 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 679 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 347 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 701 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 333 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 600 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 650 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 327 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 661 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 589 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 679 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 627 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 632 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 303 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 284 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 642 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 633 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 585 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 618 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 328 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 599 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 276 Views

Reply to Message