Active Users:568 Time:03/08/2025 08:09:43 PM
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM
I approve. =) I still think my comments made more sense than you gave them credit, but I accept your argument as better logic than mine. Well done... I think we can safely lay Asmodean reincarnation/reappearance aside as a possibility.


Absolutely your comments made sense and I apologize if I implied otherwise. I just wanted to show that the math eliminated the possibility no matter how strong the Choeden Kal was because of the number of people. Actually, since many of us are new Brandon Sanderson readers, it is a good idea to parse his words because we DON'T know if he is one of those authors who likes to play Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1806 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 760 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 833 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 395 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 772 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 765 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 880 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 835 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 780 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 668 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 682 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 701 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 700 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 709 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 662 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 751 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 697 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 704 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 697 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 665 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 724 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 691 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 706 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 784 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 745 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 745 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 662 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 705 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 743 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 606 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 607 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 654 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 716 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 368 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 759 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 352 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 635 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 684 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 347 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 701 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 628 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 715 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 665 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 677 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 323 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 301 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 674 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 675 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 621 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 664 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 348 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 631 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 300 Views

Reply to Message