That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
MightyYT Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
BS does not state one way or the other if Graendal killed him. What he does is suspect the questioner of trying to find out the answer. He also points out that if she is the one who killed Asmo, Balefiring her would not bring her back as it has been too long since Asmo died.
Your conclusion is not supported by the stated facts in any way. Rethink your conclusion.
Your conclusion is not supported by the stated facts in any way. Rethink your conclusion.
Castle: This is so weird. I dressed up as him for Halloween.
Beckett: Me too.
~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Beckett: Me too.
~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM
1899 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM
839 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM*
- 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM
448 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM
879 Views
It eliminates for the following
- 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM
895 Views
That's quite a leap of logic...
- 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM
955 Views
I can't follow your logic
- 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
734 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic.
- 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
807 Views
your interpretation is wrong
- 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM
798 Views
I generally agree...
- 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM
876 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
806 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
705 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM
771 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
- 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
789 Views
This logic is lacking as well
- 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM
845 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
800 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM*
- 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM
414 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired?
- 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
727 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired!
- 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM
841 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM*
- 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM
399 Views
What? Did you double post?
- 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM
716 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process 
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
369 Views
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
369 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible
- 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
763 Views
I don't say it's impossible...
- 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
800 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM
387 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back.
- 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM
774 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite
- 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM
773 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
- 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
716 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM*
- 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM
388 Views