Active Users:407 Time:17/06/2025 01:00:01 AM
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... Knightscape Send a noteboard - 13/11/2009 09:56:01 PM
...it's not like it makes them any deader. Getting outraged on their behalf doesn't make much sense.

The only extra risk by balefiring them (instead of just killing them in some other form of collateral damage) is the danger to the Pattern itself. And there's pretty much no other way Rand could have successfully tricked Graendal in order to eliminate her...

I'm outraged at the damage to the Pattern. There were so many ways Rand could have altered this.

Here's one...

He disguises himself as Ramshalan. He goes with the same message. However, he is holding the source all the while, and has the CK concealed with him.

The moment he gives his message, Graendal would try to compel him. All he has to do at this point is Balefire her.

Its pretty foolproof, since holding the source makes him immune to her compulsion.

There, Graendal is permanently dead, he know that she is, and the Pattern is not destabilized.


If this was so easy to do than why didn't Nynaeve or Min suggest this to him?

The pattern wanted him to do this.
If the pattern didn't want him to do this, than the pattern would have intervened. (Rand gets ready to balefire Graendal and the castle, just as he is about to complete the weave a pidgeon drops dead and falls on his arm knocking the Choendal Kal from his grasp)
All good things come to those who wait.
Reply to message
Who performs the worst atrocity in this book: Egwene or Rand? (A good Cannoli question) - 13/11/2009 06:22:50 PM 2185 Views
Egwene also killed Aes Sedai who belonged to the shadow by the dozens - 13/11/2009 07:19:14 PM 886 Views
Re: Egwene also killed Aes Sedai who belonged to the shadow by the dozens - 13/11/2009 07:25:14 PM 837 Views
Forcible turning is not the only method - 13/11/2009 08:28:08 PM 913 Views
But... - 13/11/2009 08:43:53 PM 953 Views
The point is - 13/11/2009 11:00:58 PM 691 Views
They were tried. *NM* - 14/11/2009 12:23:45 AM 340 Views
Mock trials - 14/11/2009 08:06:14 AM 790 Views
Proof? - 14/11/2009 09:09:14 AM 706 Views
That's the impression I got from Sheriam's 'trial' - 14/11/2009 09:44:09 AM 788 Views
But... - 14/11/2009 06:55:54 PM 766 Views
And if Verin had been caught, she would have deserved death. - 13/11/2009 11:55:13 PM 882 Views
Ordinarily, I would disagree... - 14/11/2009 04:20:28 AM 914 Views
Re: Ordinarily, I would disagree... - 14/11/2009 08:04:37 AM 826 Views
They had trials. No mention of them presenting such evidence. *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:54:23 PM 352 Views
Forced turnings should be killed too - 15/11/2009 07:06:43 AM 745 Views
Sad but true - 07/12/2009 05:05:08 PM 715 Views
Based on those two actions... - 13/11/2009 08:01:32 PM 897 Views
How was she going to protect the Tower and occupants then? - 13/11/2009 08:02:31 PM 813 Views
There is a difference between collateral damage and targeting your own people! *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:56:10 PM 369 Views
She did not target her own people... - 14/11/2009 12:39:14 AM 788 Views
You seem to be contradicting yourself here - 14/11/2009 07:52:07 AM 804 Views
Because they were indistinct specks high in the sky? *NM* - 14/11/2009 09:11:15 AM 348 Views
Considering the power she had in her hands - 14/11/2009 09:52:10 AM 1097 Views
That's ridiculous... - 14/11/2009 07:07:11 PM 817 Views
Re: That's ridiculous... - 14/11/2009 07:21:44 PM 776 Views
typical cannoli double speak, she wasn't targeting her own people - 14/11/2009 01:46:10 AM 2373 Views
Nothing wrong with that. - 14/11/2009 08:11:15 AM 840 Views
She does have first hand experience - 14/11/2009 07:52:20 PM 845 Views
Dozens of dark sisters together...trapped like rats... - 18/11/2009 12:29:19 AM 748 Views
Neither is an atrocity... - 13/11/2009 08:17:08 PM 1002 Views
this ^ *NM* - 13/11/2009 08:34:10 PM 313 Views
Re: Neither is an atrocity... - 13/11/2009 08:59:30 PM 827 Views
Bull Sh!t! - 13/11/2009 09:08:00 PM 876 Views
Come on now... - 13/11/2009 09:13:50 PM 796 Views
Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 09:26:11 PM 772 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 09:56:01 PM 705 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 10:08:06 PM 733 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 10:37:04 PM 783 Views
- 13/11/2009 10:45:57 PM 709 Views
Re: - 13/11/2009 11:16:58 PM 776 Views
Re: - 14/11/2009 12:34:49 AM 657 Views
Re: - 14/11/2009 01:46:51 AM 755 Views
Yes your argument is very much Bull Sh!t - 13/11/2009 09:15:17 PM 845 Views
So... - 13/11/2009 09:27:11 PM 800 Views
Re: So... - 13/11/2009 10:07:15 PM 694 Views
Not at all... - 13/11/2009 10:09:43 PM 725 Views
Re: Not at all... - 13/11/2009 10:54:14 PM 700 Views
Re: Not at all... - 14/11/2009 12:36:36 AM 701 Views
Break out the inflatable balloon swords and have at it already! - 14/11/2009 02:14:47 AM 733 Views
Rand. - 13/11/2009 09:17:14 PM 860 Views
Re: Rand. - 13/11/2009 10:56:04 PM 931 Views
But that is not her choice to make. She has NO right to decide that for anyone. *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:57:03 PM 360 Views
No, she had no right to make that choice - 14/11/2009 03:54:35 AM 690 Views
Yes, it was her choice to make, and she is now responsible for the consequences. - 16/11/2009 06:24:46 PM 1119 Views
Its the difference between - 14/11/2009 02:59:42 AM 740 Views
Cannoli mentioned already - after balefire you can live again - 20/11/2009 03:38:06 AM 684 Views

Reply to Message