Active Users:1452 Time:21/10/2025 06:01:58 AM
There is a difference between collateral damage and targeting your own people! *NM* Cannoli Send a noteboard - 13/11/2009 11:56:10 PM
So we have a To'raken that has a captured AS on it along with a couple of Dammae/Sul'dam. They attack the Tower. Is Egwene supposed to do nothing? Let it throw fireballs etc against her and the Tower? That's not an atrocity, that's just defense. The difference between that and Graendal is that Graendal and her minions were not activly attacking Rand and his forces. In addition, was there any reliable way to detect which To'raken had captured AS aboard and which didn't?
Finally, the captured AS would be enslaved and forced to reveal information, not only Traveling but also all kinds of other information that the Seanchan would use to subjugate the WT. Maybe being collared is "a fate worse than death" Egwene certainly thinks so, maybe it isn't, who is to know? However reducing the knowledge the Seanchan can get of the WT is of utmost importance.

NaCl(it's called collateral damage)H2O
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Who performs the worst atrocity in this book: Egwene or Rand? (A good Cannoli question) - 13/11/2009 06:22:50 PM 2242 Views
Egwene also killed Aes Sedai who belonged to the shadow by the dozens - 13/11/2009 07:19:14 PM 938 Views
Re: Egwene also killed Aes Sedai who belonged to the shadow by the dozens - 13/11/2009 07:25:14 PM 883 Views
Forcible turning is not the only method - 13/11/2009 08:28:08 PM 997 Views
But... - 13/11/2009 08:43:53 PM 1011 Views
The point is - 13/11/2009 11:00:58 PM 744 Views
They were tried. *NM* - 14/11/2009 12:23:45 AM 364 Views
Mock trials - 14/11/2009 08:06:14 AM 843 Views
Proof? - 14/11/2009 09:09:14 AM 781 Views
That's the impression I got from Sheriam's 'trial' - 14/11/2009 09:44:09 AM 847 Views
But... - 14/11/2009 06:55:54 PM 846 Views
And if Verin had been caught, she would have deserved death. - 13/11/2009 11:55:13 PM 939 Views
Ordinarily, I would disagree... - 14/11/2009 04:20:28 AM 982 Views
Re: Ordinarily, I would disagree... - 14/11/2009 08:04:37 AM 875 Views
They had trials. No mention of them presenting such evidence. *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:54:23 PM 380 Views
Forced turnings should be killed too - 15/11/2009 07:06:43 AM 801 Views
Sad but true - 07/12/2009 05:05:08 PM 766 Views
Based on those two actions... - 13/11/2009 08:01:32 PM 958 Views
How was she going to protect the Tower and occupants then? - 13/11/2009 08:02:31 PM 866 Views
There is a difference between collateral damage and targeting your own people! *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:56:10 PM 400 Views
She did not target her own people... - 14/11/2009 12:39:14 AM 844 Views
You seem to be contradicting yourself here - 14/11/2009 07:52:07 AM 865 Views
Because they were indistinct specks high in the sky? *NM* - 14/11/2009 09:11:15 AM 378 Views
Considering the power she had in her hands - 14/11/2009 09:52:10 AM 1149 Views
That's ridiculous... - 14/11/2009 07:07:11 PM 886 Views
Re: That's ridiculous... - 14/11/2009 07:21:44 PM 841 Views
typical cannoli double speak, she wasn't targeting her own people - 14/11/2009 01:46:10 AM 2426 Views
Nothing wrong with that. - 14/11/2009 08:11:15 AM 892 Views
She does have first hand experience - 14/11/2009 07:52:20 PM 898 Views
Dozens of dark sisters together...trapped like rats... - 18/11/2009 12:29:19 AM 803 Views
Neither is an atrocity... - 13/11/2009 08:17:08 PM 1082 Views
this ^ *NM* - 13/11/2009 08:34:10 PM 335 Views
Re: Neither is an atrocity... - 13/11/2009 08:59:30 PM 877 Views
Bull Sh!t! - 13/11/2009 09:08:00 PM 933 Views
Come on now... - 13/11/2009 09:13:50 PM 851 Views
Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 09:26:11 PM 842 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 09:56:01 PM 749 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 10:08:06 PM 779 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 10:37:04 PM 835 Views
- 13/11/2009 10:45:57 PM 760 Views
Re: - 13/11/2009 11:16:58 PM 831 Views
Re: - 14/11/2009 12:34:49 AM 729 Views
Re: - 14/11/2009 01:46:51 AM 806 Views
Yes your argument is very much Bull Sh!t - 13/11/2009 09:15:17 PM 900 Views
So... - 13/11/2009 09:27:11 PM 851 Views
Re: So... - 13/11/2009 10:07:15 PM 745 Views
Not at all... - 13/11/2009 10:09:43 PM 777 Views
Re: Not at all... - 13/11/2009 10:54:14 PM 758 Views
Re: Not at all... - 14/11/2009 12:36:36 AM 759 Views
Break out the inflatable balloon swords and have at it already! - 14/11/2009 02:14:47 AM 788 Views
Rand. - 13/11/2009 09:17:14 PM 921 Views
Re: Rand. - 13/11/2009 10:56:04 PM 1037 Views
But that is not her choice to make. She has NO right to decide that for anyone. *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:57:03 PM 393 Views
No, she had no right to make that choice - 14/11/2009 03:54:35 AM 741 Views
Yes, it was her choice to make, and she is now responsible for the consequences. - 16/11/2009 06:24:46 PM 1176 Views
Its the difference between - 14/11/2009 02:59:42 AM 798 Views
Cannoli mentioned already - after balefire you can live again - 20/11/2009 03:38:06 AM 738 Views

Reply to Message