It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
Tom Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
It's been common knowledge that Sanderson will reveal Asmodean's killer. It's also been common knowledge that Graendal will be in the next book due to the fact that the time lines are not all caught up to the same point. The fact that Graendal is likely dead does not affect her ability to reveal herself as Asmodean's killer in a POV from Graendal in the next book. This has been settled for some time.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
- 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
1479 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
897 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
- 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
1042 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
- 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
997 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
846 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
- 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
797 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
834 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
- 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
712 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
- 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
695 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
- 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
729 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
- 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
861 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
- 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
789 Views
That's wrong
- 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
904 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
- 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
852 Views
right here
- 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
773 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
345 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
326 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM
327 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
845 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
845 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
- 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
327 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
1012 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
- 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
802 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
- 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
860 Views
No. Try again.
- 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
878 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! 
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
312 Views
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
312 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
- 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
776 Views
Nonsense...
- 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
752 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. 
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
814 Views
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
814 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
728 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
679 Views