Active Users:1300 Time:20/09/2026 07:46:25 AM
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
Dragonmount reported from a recent signing the following Q&A:

Q: "Were you surprised when you found out who killed Asmodean?"

A: "Brandon had been a fan for a long time before he got to find out who killed Asmodean. He said that he had heard arguments for every possible suspect, including the really crazy ones like Tam. So when he found out the real answer, he wasn’t shocked. His reaction was more 'Oh, those guys were right'. He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself."

This surprise ("Oh, those guys were right" ) clearly speaks against the idea that the "obvious" suspect of the majority of the WoT fans, Graendal, killed Asmo. Of course, Graendal's death already made it most unlikely.

And btw, Tam is apparently also excluded..
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1565 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 996 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 1137 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 1088 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 941 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 883 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 933 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 800 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 787 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 830 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 979 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 975 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 808 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 892 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 1021 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 940 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 857 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 385 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 376 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 953 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 1103 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 353 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 363 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 783 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 907 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 358 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 886 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 962 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 972 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 820 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 975 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 883 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 851 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 896 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 817 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 776 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 1059 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 383 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 357 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 818 Views

Reply to Message