Active Users:617 Time:06/05/2026 10:36:25 PM
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
Dragonmount reported from a recent signing the following Q&A:

Q: "Were you surprised when you found out who killed Asmodean?"

A: "Brandon had been a fan for a long time before he got to find out who killed Asmodean. He said that he had heard arguments for every possible suspect, including the really crazy ones like Tam. So when he found out the real answer, he wasn’t shocked. His reaction was more 'Oh, those guys were right'. He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself."

This surprise ("Oh, those guys were right" ) clearly speaks against the idea that the "obvious" suspect of the majority of the WoT fans, Graendal, killed Asmo. Of course, Graendal's death already made it most unlikely.

And btw, Tam is apparently also excluded..
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1480 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 897 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 1042 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 997 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 846 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 797 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 834 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 712 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 695 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 729 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 861 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 875 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 721 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 789 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 904 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 852 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 773 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 326 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 327 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 845 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 1012 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 309 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 313 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 699 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 802 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 308 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 792 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 860 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 860 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 716 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 879 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 776 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 752 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 814 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 728 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 679 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 970 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 336 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 310 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 721 Views

Reply to Message