Active Users:649 Time:05/08/2026 08:42:34 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
Sentence One: It's been common knowledge that Sanderson will reveal Asmodean's killer.

This is true. Sanderson (NOT "BS", by the way) has stated this on several occasions.

Sentence Two: It's also been common knowledge that Graendal will be in the next book due to the fact that the time lines are not all caught up to the same point.

This was explicitly stated in TMJ's linked page, and I quote:

Brandon admitted there would be overlapping chronology between The Gathering Storm and The Towers of Midnight and that Graendal’s name will be mentioned a few times.

Sentence Three: The fact that Graendal is likely dead does not affect her ability to reveal herself as Asmodean's killer in a POV from Graendal in the next book.

This is a completely logical and irrefutable (at the present) conclusion to be drawn from sentences one and two. Not necessarily how it WILL happen, but simply saying that it is still technically possible that Graendal could reveal herself as Asmodean's killer or be revealed by someone else to be Asmodean's killer.

So, now, where exactly am I wrong?
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1539 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. Tom - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 964 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... ursidae - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 1115 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal Jim - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 1065 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 911 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 853 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 901 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 771 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it Etzel - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 760 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 802 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... Etzel - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 946 Views
I'm sure you can see... Legolas - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 949 Views
Well... Etzel - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 788 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. Tom - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 864 Views
That's wrong Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 989 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. Tom - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 908 Views
right here Jim - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 826 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM 390 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 363 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 361 Views
Etzel - 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 922 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM 359 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 1080 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 344 Views
Agreed. *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 352 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all beetnemesis - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 759 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... kcf - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 869 Views
Agreed *NM* Sidious - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 342 Views
I disagree... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 854 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. lord-of-shadow - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 934 Views
Personally... Legolas - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 939 Views
I think... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 786 Views
No. Try again. everynametaken - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 949 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM 345 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory Sidious - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 849 Views
Nonsense... Etzel - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 819 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. Legolas - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 872 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... Etzel - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 791 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... Sidious - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 751 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 1033 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* Mjolner - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 369 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* Ryan - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 345 Views
I agree with Etzel. Skeeve the Great - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 788 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes