Active Users:176 Time:19/05/2024 05:32:00 AM
I disagree... Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM
This lends no weight to any of the 'major' suspects in my opinion. Only that minor suspects are less likely (and frankly, I consider Slayer a minor suspect, so if anything it takes away from that theory)


The answer it clear that the killer certainly wasn't the most popular choice, Graendal.

But of course you still have the opportunity to ask BS, whom he suspected as killer, when he was just a random WoT fan.. ;)
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1127 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 571 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 673 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 685 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 518 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 499 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 501 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 416 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 370 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 395 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 546 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 479 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 399 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 480 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 594 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 486 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 455 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 202 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 185 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 554 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 689 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 188 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 177 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 400 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 476 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 185 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 503 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 530 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 522 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 407 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 550 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 464 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 446 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 493 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 425 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 382 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 663 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 184 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 180 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 402 Views

Reply to Message