Active Users:194 Time:19/05/2024 08:22:36 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
That's wrong Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
It's been common knowledge that Sanderson will reveal Asmodean's killer. It's also been common knowledge that Graendal will be in the next book due to the fact that the time lines are not all caught up to the same point. The fact that Graendal is likely dead does not affect her ability to reveal herself as Asmodean's killer in a POV from Graendal in the next book. This has been settled for some time.


BS said that Graendal will at least be mentioned in ToM. And that at the end of the book we will now, if Graendal has died or not.

Besides that, BS obviously means with the timeline issue that he will bring Perrin's, Mat's, Elayne's and some others plotlines forward, because they are behind Rand's and Egwene's timeline. Graendal is in Rand's plotline, though, and therefore up-to-date, so to speak. Therefore nothing suggestes and it doesn't make much sense that she will have another PoV.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1128 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. Tom - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 571 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... ursidae - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 673 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal Jim - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 685 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 519 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 500 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 501 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 417 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it Etzel - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 371 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 395 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... Etzel - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 547 Views
I'm sure you can see... Legolas - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 479 Views
Well... Etzel - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 400 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. Tom - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 480 Views
That's wrong Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 595 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. Tom - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 486 Views
right here Jim - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 456 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM 212 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 203 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 186 Views
Etzel - 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 554 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM 199 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 689 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 188 Views
Agreed. *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 178 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all beetnemesis - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 401 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... kcf - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 476 Views
Agreed *NM* Sidious - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 186 Views
I disagree... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 503 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. lord-of-shadow - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 532 Views
Personally... Legolas - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 522 Views
I think... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 407 Views
No. Try again. everynametaken - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 551 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM 193 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory Sidious - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 464 Views
Nonsense... Etzel - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 447 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. Legolas - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 494 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... Etzel - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 425 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... Sidious - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 383 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 663 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* Mjolner - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 185 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* Ryan - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 180 Views
I agree with Etzel. Skeeve the Great - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 403 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes