Active Users:452 Time:16/10/2025 06:49:33 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
Sentence One: It's been common knowledge that Sanderson will reveal Asmodean's killer.

This is true. Sanderson (NOT "BS", by the way) has stated this on several occasions.

Sentence Two: It's also been common knowledge that Graendal will be in the next book due to the fact that the time lines are not all caught up to the same point.

This was explicitly stated in TMJ's linked page, and I quote:

Brandon admitted there would be overlapping chronology between The Gathering Storm and The Towers of Midnight and that Graendal’s name will be mentioned a few times.

Sentence Three: The fact that Graendal is likely dead does not affect her ability to reveal herself as Asmodean's killer in a POV from Graendal in the next book.

This is a completely logical and irrefutable (at the present) conclusion to be drawn from sentences one and two. Not necessarily how it WILL happen, but simply saying that it is still technically possible that Graendal could reveal herself as Asmodean's killer or be revealed by someone else to be Asmodean's killer.

So, now, where exactly am I wrong?
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1320 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. Tom - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 762 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... ursidae - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 888 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal Jim - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 872 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 718 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 680 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV Etzel - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 690 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 610 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it Etzel - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 567 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 594 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... Etzel - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 741 Views
I'm sure you can see... Legolas - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 758 Views
Well... Etzel - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 595 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. Tom - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 664 Views
That's wrong Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 779 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. Tom - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 746 Views
right here Jim - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 656 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM 297 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 281 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* Tom - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 264 Views
Etzel - 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 725 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM 285 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 867 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 265 Views
Agreed. *NM* Etzel - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 256 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all beetnemesis - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 580 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... kcf - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 669 Views
Agreed *NM* Sidious - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 260 Views
I disagree... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 697 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. lord-of-shadow - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 737 Views
Personally... Legolas - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 728 Views
I think... Etzel - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 593 Views
No. Try again. everynametaken - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 735 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM 262 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory Sidious - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 662 Views
Nonsense... Etzel - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 626 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. Legolas - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 685 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... Etzel - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 614 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... Sidious - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 556 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* Etzel - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 845 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* Mjolner - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 274 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* Ryan - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 257 Views
I agree with Etzel. Skeeve the Great - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 599 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes