Active Users:406 Time:13/12/2025 04:01:56 PM
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims redhand Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM
Can you, or should you trust a powerful organization answerable to no one but itself? Can an organization like that do more than incidential good for outsiders, more than what its members can do individually without the organization?

As has been pointed out, the only good were done by individual Sisters, without the need of a White Tower.

It is telling that the purposes each Ajah has are just mostly empty promises, escepially the Green, and the Yellow. For the Red, does it need to be the biggest Ajah to do its job?

So you kind of get it when you start to question their existance. The AS are written not as an example of ideals, but as something we should avoid. Of course the AS fail very hard, they are what you don't want to be.

Kingdoms and Empires are answerable only to itself, the rulers. And we no longer organize a country that way. We found better ways to do so. There are better ways to organize channelers than making them the current Aes Sedai.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1406 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 988 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 486 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 358 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 931 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 755 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 862 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 782 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 764 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 705 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 800 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 747 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 700 Views
AS exist for you to question the purpose of all self-serving organizations making grand claims - 17/11/2009 09:31:24 AM 2143 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 778 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 691 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 940 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 751 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 729 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 430 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 852 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 704 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 344 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 467 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 743 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 656 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 685 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 627 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 677 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 675 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 737 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 638 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 605 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 808 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 649 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 667 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 653 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 862 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 734 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 784 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 725 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 697 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 831 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 928 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 620 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 694 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 678 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 792 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 643 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 320 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 665 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 625 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 724 Views

Reply to Message