Active Users:647 Time:02/02/2026 02:15:56 AM
You're asking the wrong question HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM
..or at least looking at it in the wrong direction. Instead of looking at what has been done and asking "are they relevent," look at what tehy should have and would have done, if they had not been infiltrated and subverted by the shadow. Suan and Moirane had a plan and it was working. They were moving subtly and had just about everything in position when the Black Ajah rose up and shattered their plans, and the Tower. Everything that happened after that was not the WT at work but BA manipulations.

There is a parallel to the Children of the light as well, though it is not explored as deeply in the books. It was not an accident that both the organizations that *should* have been major forces for the light were made inefectual at the same time.
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1428 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1007 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 494 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 366 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 954 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 775 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 882 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 802 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 787 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 732 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 814 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 767 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 718 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 803 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 709 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 961 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 768 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 754 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 438 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 867 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 729 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 352 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 475 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 766 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 676 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 700 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 646 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 696 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 689 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 761 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 655 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 624 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 825 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 683 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 687 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 674 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 884 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 748 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 808 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 743 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 716 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 848 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 950 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 641 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 712 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 698 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 812 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 664 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 328 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 687 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 647 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 740 Views

Reply to Message