Active Users:620 Time:02/02/2026 03:58:26 AM
I think those critiques are overblown and not based on a fair analaysis of WoT History RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 18/11/2009 03:15:12 PM
That could be one interpretation, but in my opinion, many readers neglect the fact that during the most powerful parts of Hawkwing's reign, Aes Sedai served as governors, regional advisors and dignitaries. Aftey Ishamael damaged Hawkwing's relations with the White Tower, assisted by Bonwhin's petty mistakes and mismanagement, the Empire quickly fell into a decline.

I would point out, on the other hand, that the fact that Deane Aryman came close to achieving what she did so soon after the Tower's lowest point shows how much potential the White Tower possesses for doing good. It is clear, for example, that if Rashima Kerenmosa did not lead the forces of Light, the Trolloc Wars would have swept away all the human civilizations well before Artur Hawkwing had a chance to come to power.

I think blaming the White Tower for "holding civilization back" is ridiculous, in that the rate of technological achievement and cultural development has less to do with Aes Sedai intervention and more to do with the capacity for non-channelers to use times of peace to develop new survival methods. The White Tower, for example, did not dissuade or promote the inventions coming from Rand al'Thor's schools - those developments and achievements are actually outside of the White Tower's broader purview, which is that of a moderating influence in society.

Basically, don't blame the White Tower for the lack of research and development, blame the chaotic nature of military and political conflict, which the White Tower did many things to minimize.

Ironically, I think too much Aes Sedai involvement, such as in the Age of Legends, weakens overall technological achievement and cultural development - as soon as a schism happened in the Hall of Servants during that Age, society quickly began to fall apart as Aes Sedai held too much power and influence in too many spheres. The White Tower, on the other hand, was developed as a stopgap measure to PREVENT the deterioration of society - it was formed out of a need to consolidate the resources of the female Aes Sedai so that more would not be lost, so it is not a surprise that so little forward development occurred within the Tower.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 19/11/2009 at 04:00:19 PM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1428 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1008 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 494 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 366 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 954 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 775 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 882 Views
I think those critiques are overblown and not based on a fair analaysis of WoT History - 18/11/2009 03:15:12 PM 857 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 803 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 787 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 732 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 815 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 767 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 718 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 805 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 710 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 963 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 768 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 754 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 438 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 868 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 730 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 352 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 476 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 767 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 677 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 700 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 647 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 696 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 689 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 761 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 656 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 624 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 826 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 684 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 688 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 675 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 885 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 748 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 809 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 743 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 717 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 849 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 951 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 642 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 713 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 698 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 813 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 665 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 329 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 687 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 648 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 740 Views

Reply to Message