Active Users:646 Time:02/02/2026 02:15:19 AM
I think those critiques are overblown and not based on a fair analaysis of WoT History RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 18/11/2009 03:15:12 PM
That could be one interpretation, but in my opinion, many readers neglect the fact that during the most powerful parts of Hawkwing's reign, Aes Sedai served as governors, regional advisors and dignitaries. Aftey Ishamael damaged Hawkwing's relations with the White Tower, assisted by Bonwhin's petty mistakes and mismanagement, the Empire quickly fell into a decline.

I would point out, on the other hand, that the fact that Deane Aryman came close to achieving what she did so soon after the Tower's lowest point shows how much potential the White Tower possesses for doing good. It is clear, for example, that if Rashima Kerenmosa did not lead the forces of Light, the Trolloc Wars would have swept away all the human civilizations well before Artur Hawkwing had a chance to come to power.

I think blaming the White Tower for "holding civilization back" is ridiculous, in that the rate of technological achievement and cultural development has less to do with Aes Sedai intervention and more to do with the capacity for non-channelers to use times of peace to develop new survival methods. The White Tower, for example, did not dissuade or promote the inventions coming from Rand al'Thor's schools - those developments and achievements are actually outside of the White Tower's broader purview, which is that of a moderating influence in society.

Basically, don't blame the White Tower for the lack of research and development, blame the chaotic nature of military and political conflict, which the White Tower did many things to minimize.

Ironically, I think too much Aes Sedai involvement, such as in the Age of Legends, weakens overall technological achievement and cultural development - as soon as a schism happened in the Hall of Servants during that Age, society quickly began to fall apart as Aes Sedai held too much power and influence in too many spheres. The White Tower, on the other hand, was developed as a stopgap measure to PREVENT the deterioration of society - it was formed out of a need to consolidate the resources of the female Aes Sedai so that more would not be lost, so it is not a surprise that so little forward development occurred within the Tower.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 19/11/2009 at 04:00:19 PM
Reply to message
Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 05:18:52 AM 1427 Views
They are politicians at heart... - 17/11/2009 05:31:41 AM 1007 Views
You remember Moiraine, right? And Cadsuane? *NM* - 17/11/2009 05:32:50 AM 493 Views
That's individual AS, not AS as a group. *NM* - 17/11/2009 06:23:52 AM 365 Views
Short answer: nope. - 17/11/2009 05:51:01 AM 953 Views
Wonderful response, and I agree. - 17/11/2009 08:18:30 PM 774 Views
rather.. - 18/11/2009 08:32:10 AM 881 Views
I think those critiques are overblown and not based on a fair analaysis of WoT History - 18/11/2009 03:15:12 PM 856 Views
Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 05:04:58 PM 802 Views
Re: Hawkwing included AS until Ishmael got to him so that really not true. - 18/11/2009 09:16:04 PM 786 Views
Their Tower allegience was always superior to their Empire allegience but was Bonwhine - 23/11/2009 02:29:57 AM 731 Views
But then.. - 23/11/2009 08:30:37 AM 814 Views
Kind of Sort of - 17/11/2009 07:05:51 AM 766 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 07:50:48 AM 717 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 17/11/2009 02:36:33 PM 803 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 01:48:27 PM 709 Views
Re: Aes Sedai - question for the WoT experts..... - 19/11/2009 09:14:14 PM 961 Views
You're asking the wrong question - 17/11/2009 05:35:06 PM 767 Views
You could ask the exact same questions about the Ashaman, or the Aiel, or the SeaFolk, or any group - 18/11/2009 11:49:25 AM 753 Views
SeaFolk yes, Aiel or Ashamen no.....stupid reply.....try again if you would like. *NM* - 18/11/2009 05:56:54 PM 437 Views
Scored using your words - 18/11/2009 06:33:31 PM 867 Views
Slow down Professor.....the AS have killed 1 Forsaken..... - 18/11/2009 10:59:39 PM 729 Views
I think he's counting Nynaeve and Egwene *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:21:20 PM 351 Views
So who killed Lanfear? *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:59:27 PM 475 Views
You mean Lanfear/Cyndane.....nobody..... - 19/11/2009 12:04:10 AM 766 Views
They reduced her in power. - 19/11/2009 12:39:17 AM 676 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 01:33:56 AM 699 Views
So you've decided to redefine words now? - 19/11/2009 01:42:48 AM 646 Views
Have you read the books? - 19/11/2009 01:39:37 AM 695 Views
I will type more slowly.....the AS have killed 1 and only 1 Forsaken..... - 19/11/2009 04:00:59 AM 688 Views
So? - 19/11/2009 05:00:13 AM 760 Views
Oh dear! - 19/11/2009 11:51:17 AM 655 Views
Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:04:44 PM 623 Views
Re: Read the new book.....as Rand points out.....no balefire, no death..... - 19/11/2009 03:11:36 PM 825 Views
This is silly - 19/11/2009 07:29:33 PM 683 Views
There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:45:18 PM 687 Views
The point I made is - 19/11/2009 07:48:52 PM 674 Views
Are we speaking english? - 19/11/2009 08:07:45 PM 884 Views
Not really - 19/11/2009 08:19:49 PM 748 Views
Re: There is no misrepresentation - 19/11/2009 07:49:29 PM 808 Views
OK - 19/11/2009 08:15:08 PM 742 Views
No idea - 19/11/2009 08:17:09 PM 716 Views
OK fair enough, I do too, - 19/11/2009 08:31:11 PM 848 Views
Well what do you think of - 19/11/2009 08:56:38 PM 950 Views
And another point - 19/11/2009 03:05:45 PM 641 Views
For the sake of argument, though - 19/11/2009 03:49:23 PM 712 Views
OK fair enough - 19/11/2009 07:56:00 PM 697 Views
- 19/11/2009 12:06:02 AM 812 Views
There isn't much in this series I would call "filler" - seriously? - 19/11/2009 12:11:14 AM 664 Views
You're bothering to discuss a series with three books of "filler"- seriously? *NM* - 19/11/2009 01:34:43 AM 328 Views
Just skipped over them.....no big deal slick..... - 19/11/2009 04:02:57 AM 686 Views
Yeah right... - 19/11/2009 04:58:54 AM 647 Views
Yes, seriously - 20/11/2009 01:11:18 AM 739 Views

Reply to Message