Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
Shannow Send a noteboard - 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
In other words, why go to all the trouble of creating a mechanism whereby a transmigrated Forsaken's strength can be reduced, if it is to have no real impact?
Where Semirhage's source of strength was her reputation as a torturer, and the fear this evoked in others, Lanfear's source of strength has always simply been her STRENGTH. The fact that it is superior to that of the other Forsaken females.
So, if RJ was somehow attempting to strip the Forsaken of their auras of greatness, would it not make much more sense to reduce Cyndane to the unfamiliar position of being weaker than some of her competitors among the Chosen?
I think it would fit the pattern.
But, as we've already said, we cannot be sure. After Sanderson's first, incorrect quote, we could place Cyndane below Nynaeve for sure.
After his partial retraction, we don't know how far we should move her up again. He still maintains she is significantly weakened. And his emphasis on the 6 women above Nynaeve did not tie up with his uncertainty regarding Cyndane. Basically, it does not seem as if she was one of the names among the 6, else he would surely not have made such an issue about her reduced status.
Anyway, until Sanderson clarifies what he meant, the debate can continue.
Where Semirhage's source of strength was her reputation as a torturer, and the fear this evoked in others, Lanfear's source of strength has always simply been her STRENGTH. The fact that it is superior to that of the other Forsaken females.
So, if RJ was somehow attempting to strip the Forsaken of their auras of greatness, would it not make much more sense to reduce Cyndane to the unfamiliar position of being weaker than some of her competitors among the Chosen?
I think it would fit the pattern.
But, as we've already said, we cannot be sure. After Sanderson's first, incorrect quote, we could place Cyndane below Nynaeve for sure.
After his partial retraction, we don't know how far we should move her up again. He still maintains she is significantly weakened. And his emphasis on the 6 women above Nynaeve did not tie up with his uncertainty regarding Cyndane. Basically, it does not seem as if she was one of the names among the 6, else he would surely not have made such an issue about her reduced status.
Anyway, until Sanderson clarifies what he meant, the debate can continue.
Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM
2091 Views
Except...
- 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM
1093 Views
There's no evidence for that
- 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM
1088 Views
I agree with Sidious - we have no evidence at this time, so she should remain off the list
- 19/11/2009 04:38:31 PM
1104 Views
It's common sense
- 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM
1007 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing
- 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM
1125 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia...
- 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM
974 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start!
- 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM
1181 Views
Hmm...
- 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM
1156 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference...
- 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM
1245 Views
But I'm not
- 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM
1126 Views
Let me ask you this...
- 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM
1207 Views
All assumption
- 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM
1076 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
- 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
974 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all
- 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM
1102 Views
Why?
- 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM
1645 Views
Re: Why?
- 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM
1012 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
983 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM
1021 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then?
- 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM
1122 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed.
- 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM
1022 Views
Yeah... entirely
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
989 Views
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
989 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM*
- 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM
674 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM
1135 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity??
- 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
1122 Views
Seems good, except I'd bunch up the upper levels and place Nynaeve a little higher. *NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:46:16 PM
556 Views
Too many levels
- 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM
1088 Views
21 levels is largely a myth
- 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM
1014 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons.
- 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM
1132 Views
I thought of something else to support my upper limit theory on gateways
- 20/11/2009 01:53:05 PM
1124 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve
- 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM
1237 Views
more hopefully to come
- 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM
913 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask.
- 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM
1174 Views
I'm the same way. I should be studying for law school finals, but I'm distracted. *NM*
- 20/11/2009 09:45:46 PM
466 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken
- 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM
936 Views
