Active Users:659 Time:13/05/2026 02:30:17 PM
Hmm... Sidious Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM

I disagree. I think Sanderson has given us important new info that throws the female strength list into turmoil.

Here's why I say so:

1. It is a fallacy that RJ said Nynaeve was as strong as the average female Forsaken. That was our INTERPRETATION. But if I recall correctly, what RJ actually said, was that Nynaeve was as strong as MOST of the female Forsaken.

After Sanderson's quote, I take that to mean that MOST of the female Forsaken are not stronger than Nynaeve.


That was because RJ said that quote when FoH was out, making Nynaeve at least equal or as strong as Moghedien, Semirhage and Mesaana - and weaker than Graendal and Lanfear. Cyndane was not around. That still holds with what RJ said. If Cyndane is really that weak then Lanfear was enormously powerful compared to Graendal, and I find that very unlikely. On the other hand, it fits in with Semirhage's statement that Lanfear be given to her.

The Cyndane quote is an interesting one, and it would be great if Sanderson could clarify the situation for us. But the fact remains that he has not refuted the fact that she is significantly weakened, nor has he refuted the fact that she is below Nynaeve in strength.

In fact, his initial reaction to KCF's question was that only exceptional women are above Nynaeve, and when KCF referred to Cyndane, he was very dismissive of her strength.


To be honest, his next answer scares me. The fact that he argued with Maria over her strength which is clearly on a strength list is horrendous. He initially said that Cyndane was very very weak... who knows if he was confused with Cyndane and Cetalia or Cabriana. Then he said she was weakened, then he said her strength is what we expect it to be.

I agree that the so called definitive strength list hinges around Cyndane's placement, and until Sanderson clarifies the confusion he caused, that placement is now in doubt.


If Cyndane is weaker than Nynaeve it not only throws the female Forsaken into turmoil but the males too and it makes Lanfear so strong it's scary.

Still, we now know Mesaana overrated herself, and we know there are only 6 women above Nynaeve.


Well Mesaana didn't overrate herself actually. She said she matched Semirhage well in most areas and had strength where Semirhage had weaknesses. I still think this is true - Mesaana might be good at the weather for instance - we know that Semirhage is not.

Lanfear, Alivia and Sharina are definitely there. Talaan and Semirhage MIGHT be there. We're not sure of Someryn and we're not sure of Cyndane and Graendal.


Lanfear, Alivia and Sharina for certain. I think there's almost a 100% chance that Cyndane and Graendal are there too because many quotes in the series support this. Someryn is conjecture, but she is probably Forsaken strength.

It is also conceivable that Cyndane is now equal to Nynaeve, making Graendal weaker than Nynaeve.


I don't believe that someone of Nynaeve's strength could fight Alivia with a strong angreal, no matter what her knowledge.

With the new info Sanderson so graciously provided, I'm expecting further clarity in the near future.


I just want him to look at the list before he answers.

Now we just need to get people to ask him. I see that this topic is now being discussed on Theoryland, Dragonmount, 13th depository and even on ASOIAF boards.

Surely the level of interest will result in more people asking him these kinds of questions.


We should move on to the males. They're actually more of an enigma.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM 1972 Views
Except... - 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM 991 Views
There's no evidence for that - 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM 937 Views
It's common sense - 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM 869 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing - 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM 999 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia... - 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM 864 Views
I didn't say that - 19/11/2009 05:07:33 PM 917 Views
Well, I think you are wrong... - 19/11/2009 05:35:27 PM 895 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start! - 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM 1025 Views
Hmm... - 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM 1031 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference... - 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM 1108 Views
But I'm not - 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM 987 Views
Let me ask you this... - 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM 1035 Views
Very good point *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:38:55 AM 450 Views
One possibility - 20/11/2009 03:18:55 AM 963 Views
All assumption - 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM 928 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance? - 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM 855 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all - 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM 994 Views
Why? - 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM 1516 Views
Re: Why? - 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM 893 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM 882 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)... - 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM 889 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then? - 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM 1003 Views
Probably not in this case - 21/11/2009 11:34:25 PM 872 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed. - 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM 884 Views
Yeah... entirely - 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM 849 Views
Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 20/11/2009 09:57:52 PM 881 Views
Re: Okay, "entirely" was a bad choice of word. - 21/11/2009 10:48:16 AM 963 Views
Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:30:27 PM 923 Views
*correction*Re: Let me ask you this... - 23/12/2009 04:32:02 PM 883 Views
my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:37:27 PM 943 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 19/11/2009 04:54:30 PM 1025 Views
Re: my comments w/ edit - 23/12/2009 04:42:15 PM 818 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM 599 Views
http://13depository.blogspot.com/ *NM* - 19/11/2009 05:31:01 PM 467 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post - 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM 971 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity?? - 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM 973 Views
This perfectly matches my understanding of the situation. - 19/11/2009 07:06:31 PM 833 Views
Agreed! This make more sense than the previous list *NM* - 20/11/2009 12:07:37 AM 507 Views
Too many levels - 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM 960 Views
You are completely right about too many levels. - 20/11/2009 04:17:17 AM 845 Views
21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM 886 Views
Re: 21 levels is largely a myth - 20/11/2009 01:51:17 PM 979 Views
Thanks for the post. Interesting stuff there. *NM* - 20/11/2009 03:14:12 PM 430 Views
That's good to know. - 20/11/2009 07:56:41 PM 831 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM 1000 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM 1101 Views
Re: Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve - 28/11/2009 10:05:15 PM 1108 Views
Talaan has be channeling for 6 or 7 years - 28/11/2009 10:56:12 PM 881 Views
Re: I have to disagree for a couple of reasons. - 30/12/2009 12:37:40 AM 1323 Views
Agree with nearly all - 20/11/2009 04:43:47 AM 829 Views
more hopefully to come - 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM 812 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask. - 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM 1061 Views
A little more evidence that Nynaeve is stronger than Semirhage - 29/11/2009 12:12:37 AM 902 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken - 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM 820 Views
It's possible - 30/11/2009 08:23:28 PM 868 Views
Re: It's possible - 01/12/2009 06:18:56 PM 941 Views

Reply to Message