Active Users:483 Time:02/05/2025 10:23:02 PM
I really doubt Nynaeve strength channelers are one in thousand... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 22/11/2009 12:09:15 AM

I think the strength levels work in powers of ten...
- 1 in 10 - Moiraine strength
- 1 in 100 - Egwene strength
- 1 in 1000 - Nynaeve strength
- 1 in 10 000 - Graendal strength
- 1 in 100 000 - Lanfear strength

Nor do I think it makes sense that there's such a vast difference in numbers from Lanfear to Graendal.

While Lanfear strength women are surely rarer than Graendal strength women, they cannot be that much rarer given the bell curve distribution. As we move towards the upper echelons (and the lower) the curve is getting flatter, and closer to zero.

Its more likely one in 100,000 for Lanfear, 1 in 95,000 for Grandal and 1 in 90,000 for Nynaeve (assuming the old list is still true).
Reply to message
Is Nynaeve of "very rare" strength? - 21/11/2009 02:53:22 PM 1489 Views
BS said... - 21/11/2009 02:57:58 PM 862 Views
Actually, you are adding a word that isn't there. - 21/11/2009 03:47:48 PM 1049 Views
IMO, it's self evident that the female list only contains named characters - 21/11/2009 03:58:33 PM 729 Views
IMO, the above post by "Logain" is trolling and not worth the debating!! *NM* - 21/11/2009 04:01:08 PM 276 Views
I have a valid reason for asking. - 21/11/2009 04:05:52 PM 831 Views
I can assure you... - 21/11/2009 04:47:18 PM 672 Views
Re: IMO, it's self evident that the female list only contains named characters - 21/11/2009 04:09:58 PM 598 Views
I don't know - 21/11/2009 04:17:02 PM 558 Views
I find it unlikely that a super strong channeler would end up being unimportant to the plot *NM* - 21/11/2009 11:54:43 PM 263 Views
This sounds semi-mystical... - 24/11/2009 04:45:52 PM 530 Views
Also, if they were that strong, they would then be important. - 29/11/2009 05:24:35 PM 507 Views
she's in the top 0.1% of channelers we know of - 21/11/2009 03:01:02 PM 619 Views
She's in the top 0.05% *NM* - 21/11/2009 11:41:42 PM 261 Views
so shes also in the top 0.1%? *NM* - 22/11/2009 12:04:00 AM 263 Views
Of course. My figure is more exclusive. *NM* - 22/11/2009 12:23:23 AM 242 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/11/2009 03:56:12 PM 256 Views
Yes, though obviously Etzel is right. - 21/11/2009 04:08:41 PM 713 Views
Re: Is Nynaeve of "very rare" strength? - 21/11/2009 06:00:29 PM 579 Views
So what's the point? Why the quotes? *NM* - 21/11/2009 10:24:37 PM 250 Views
Re: So what's the point? Why the quotes? - 24/11/2009 07:31:37 PM 516 Views
Actually... what Graenal says - 25/11/2009 09:39:05 PM 572 Views
Well... - 21/11/2009 11:44:40 PM 623 Views
I really doubt Nynaeve strength channelers are one in thousand... - 22/11/2009 12:09:15 AM 617 Views
I agree with you! - 23/11/2009 12:48:35 AM 541 Views
Re: I agree with you! - 23/11/2009 03:56:14 AM 583 Views
Re: I agree with you! - 25/11/2009 05:50:06 PM 562 Views
Re: I agree with you! - 26/11/2009 05:10:22 PM 678 Views
Re: I agree with you! - 26/11/2009 07:22:30 PM 566 Views
Re: I agree with you! - 26/11/2009 07:36:38 PM 524 Views
Hmmm... - 26/11/2009 10:38:44 PM 582 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 27/11/2009 04:36:59 AM 603 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 27/11/2009 05:11:46 AM 590 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 27/11/2009 04:23:59 PM 559 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 27/11/2009 06:13:26 PM 649 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 27/11/2009 05:40:50 AM 625 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 27/11/2009 04:42:36 PM 631 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 27/11/2009 05:53:11 PM 589 Views
Re: not being able to shield Elayne - 28/11/2009 09:46:24 PM 535 Views
Yes, the incidents rather cancel each other out IMO - 29/11/2009 12:55:04 AM 551 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 30/11/2009 04:44:41 AM 618 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 30/11/2009 05:50:37 AM 635 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 30/11/2009 08:09:24 PM 606 Views
This is our never ending debate ... at least it's a good one - 01/12/2009 03:31:40 PM 826 Views
Re: Hmmm... - 30/11/2009 08:57:50 PM 762 Views
Re: Well... - 24/11/2009 07:41:57 PM 508 Views
Re: Is Nynaeve of "very rare" strength? Yes *NM* - 22/11/2009 05:29:17 AM 256 Views
Yes. *NM* - 24/11/2009 05:56:17 PM 279 Views
Yes. *NM* - 25/11/2009 06:22:09 PM 237 Views

Reply to Message