Active Users:922 Time:31/10/2026 12:19:44 PM
What crime? Accepting her unethical promotions? Being afraid of the Hall's injustice? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 10/12/2009 03:51:05 PM


Egwene bound criminals to herself - women who had committed noticible crimes against Tower Law. These women were all given the option to face the consequences or give an Oath of Fealty. None of them really hesitated, which proves how severe their crimes were and how they were willing to accept a lesser punishment instead of a larger disgrace.

Elaida wanted to bind all Aes Sedai to her using a ter'angreal. That's more like Therava's punishment on Galina.


Elaida might be wrong, but your characterization of those who Egwene induced to swear to her is absurd. Nothing Myrelle did with Lan is against Tower law, and her fear of punishment does not prove her guilt, only the likelihood of her being punished, justly or not. In what sense is it possibly just to punish the "crime" of bonding a man against his will, by making four other men have their bonds passed to different sisters, equally against their will, and more obnoxiously so, because they had no share of the guilt of the crime? They seem to think it is a probable punishment, and the injustice of the sentence does not change its likelihood or severity, or lessen the desire of Myrelle & Nisao to shield their warders and themselves from such a punishment.

As for the committee sending the agents provacateur into the Tower, they did that when they had a perfect right to. There was no reason to tell the Hall, and good reasons to keep quiet. It was done before the Hall was elected, for crying out loud! Siuan's own argument that the committee had no right to second-guess her actions as Amyrlin when she had a perfect right to send Accepted out after the Black Ajah with writs of her authority is just as valid in the committee's defense, and their action was not nearly so radical.

If these were in fact crimes, Egwene is a hypocrite for covering them up, and absolutely no different than a magistrate or a prosecutor who accepts a bribe in return for delivering a verdict of "not guilty" or for dropping the case. If they were not crimes, she owes it to her "daughters" and to the Tower and justice to shield them from unjust punishment. Either way, she had no cause to blackmail them.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
Egwene - hypocrite - 10/12/2009 01:20:24 PM 1770 Views
Re: Egwene - hypocrite - 10/12/2009 01:33:00 PM 1282 Views
Not the same at all really - 10/12/2009 02:12:36 PM 1028 Views
How do you explain the BA Hunters? - 10/12/2009 02:21:28 PM 963 Views
I agree. - 10/12/2009 03:03:49 PM 924 Views
Agreed - 10/12/2009 04:01:40 PM 817 Views
Disagree - 10/12/2009 04:50:13 PM 916 Views
Just Agree to Disagree *NM* - 11/12/2009 12:53:46 PM 397 Views
What crime? Accepting her unethical promotions? Being afraid of the Hall's injustice? - 10/12/2009 03:51:05 PM 935 Views
Well... - 10/12/2009 03:58:48 PM 911 Views
Don't be ridiculous - 17/12/2009 12:05:46 PM 799 Views
But... - 10/12/2009 05:54:39 PM 830 Views
Let he who has no sin cast the first stone - 10/12/2009 04:34:06 PM 857 Views
Re: Let he who has no sin cast the first stone - 12/12/2009 12:41:33 PM 783 Views
Leane too - 13/12/2009 06:09:31 AM 770 Views
Not really - 10/12/2009 03:06:30 PM 898 Views
Really - 10/12/2009 04:52:10 PM 796 Views
Re: Really - 10/12/2009 11:56:30 PM 898 Views
Sure. - 10/12/2009 05:03:00 PM 776 Views
Actually, I agree. - 10/12/2009 06:47:22 PM 799 Views
I like Egwene - 10/12/2009 07:08:24 PM 831 Views
That really disappointed me. - 10/12/2009 07:29:14 PM 878 Views
funny, I'm more of the mind set that both groups were right - 11/12/2009 12:02:50 AM 788 Views
Not the problem. - 11/12/2009 12:13:26 AM 750 Views
I do agree with DomA and the others on the point that - 11/12/2009 07:13:31 AM 808 Views
Re: I do agree with DomA and the others on the point that - 11/12/2009 08:20:19 AM 870 Views
*shrugs* - 11/12/2009 02:06:47 PM 872 Views
You have no basis for that assertion. - 11/12/2009 07:12:03 PM 840 Views
Not really the case - 11/12/2009 07:20:43 PM 833 Views
They refuse to reveal the Ajah Heads to Egwene, despite her express orders. Doubt Meidani could... - 12/12/2009 09:44:23 AM 960 Views
Ah, true that. - 12/12/2009 07:20:04 PM 851 Views
Who said she wasn't wrong? - 12/12/2009 09:02:55 PM 763 Views
Re: Who said she wasn't wrong? - 13/12/2009 04:16:56 AM 829 Views
Re: Who said she wasn't wrong? - 13/12/2009 08:12:25 AM 861 Views
Re: Who said she wasn't wrong? - 13/12/2009 07:35:10 PM 765 Views
Re: Who said she wasn't wrong? - 13/12/2009 08:27:53 PM 733 Views
Not true. - 14/12/2009 02:41:28 AM 876 Views
I agree with most of your point - 10/12/2009 09:49:18 PM 885 Views
Fealty swearing sisters are no longer around... - 11/12/2009 12:57:49 AM 767 Views
Re: Fealty swearing sisters are no longer around... - 11/12/2009 07:18:33 AM 807 Views
The main differences between the two oaths - 10/12/2009 07:00:55 PM 1253 Views
Of course she is a hypocrite - 11/12/2009 05:22:56 AM 847 Views
The same can be said of Nynaeve and Mat - 11/12/2009 07:20:47 AM 861 Views
Probably because they're all human - 12/12/2009 12:43:53 PM 744 Views
- 12/12/2009 04:05:13 PM 827 Views

Reply to Message