Active Users:1546 Time:25/12/2025 05:57:43 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
But what was the purpose then? Etzel Send a noteboard - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM
Why did RJ show us that Fain captured and broke this Myrddraal in TSR, followed by some arrangement between them, and finally let Faim take the Myrddraal to Caemlyn in LoC?

Is the reason that RJ just wanted to point out that Fain can control a Myrddraal (which are anyway "cannon fodder" in your words)? Or might it be a little detail, which is largely overlooked, but might become important in ToM and/or AMoL? (the books will apparently feature Fain and Slayer, according to BS)
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal Etzel - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1985 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* Lordling - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 516 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 499 Views
But what was the purpose then? Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 936 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO Bonden - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 878 Views
Maybe... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 959 Views
Re: Maybe... Bonden - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1170 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 929 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 946 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 862 Views
The explanations Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 1119 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 1058 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1981 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 860 Views
Well... Etzel - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 907 Views
Indeed *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 452 Views
Re: The explanations RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 798 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 899 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 979 Views
The reason is... Etzel - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 927 Views
The reasoning is very weak. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 949 Views
If you mean... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 1018 Views
A few points darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 858 Views
You are wrong... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 857 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 958 Views
Key word - "possibly" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 860 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 826 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 755 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 842 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 760 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 798 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 852 Views
You confuse it a bit... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 909 Views
I think you've got it backwards darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 813 Views
However... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 844 Views
I wasn't arguing that point darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 1082 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 805 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 777 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 857 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 967 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 914 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 858 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 821 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 938 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 967 Views
Well, I disagree of course... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 1089 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 999 Views
Actually... Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 910 Views
BWB says... darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1149 Views
Exactly. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 430 Views
Well... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 968 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 873 Views
No... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 1080 Views
Re: No... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 1039 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 793 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 821 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 764 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 857 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 720 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 816 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 436 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 712 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 934 Views
I don't say... Etzel - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 1039 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC darius_sedai - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 928 Views
Re: Well... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 841 Views
It becomes clear... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 765 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 733 Views
Fair enough. *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 480 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 1032 Views
As said... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 836 Views
Re: As said... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 826 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 800 Views
makes you wonder darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 893 Views
Re: makes you wonder RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 899 Views
I think... Etzel - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 802 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* aldapelan - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 490 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 453 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* Gher - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 444 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes