I think the explanations are relatively weak - I've never been convinced that Slayer had the motive, capability or the opportunity, nor that given the confluence of the three, he wouldn't have been punished for not attacking Rand. To make the "Slayer did it" line of reasoning worse, we now have examples of at least one, but possibly two Forsaken expressly brought back in order to set conditions to punish them for disobedience and disloyalty, implying that Asmodean was balefired since it seems the Dark One would rather punish his followers than assassinate them.
I don't know - I doubt you could convince me on this because basically I don't really care who killed Asmodean so I'm not emotionally invested in any particular villain and a few better theories linking it to Graendal have been put forth that, frankly speaking, the "Slayer" theory looks like the only reason people latched on to him is because of his nickname and his creepy but heretofore relatively unimpressive powers.
I don't know - I doubt you could convince me on this because basically I don't really care who killed Asmodean so I'm not emotionally invested in any particular villain and a few better theories linking it to Graendal have been put forth that, frankly speaking, the "Slayer" theory looks like the only reason people latched on to him is because of his nickname and his creepy but heretofore relatively unimpressive powers.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Fain's Myrddraal
- 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM
1985 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM*
- 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM
516 Views
But what was the purpose then?
- 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM
936 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal
- 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM
929 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand
- 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM
946 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo
- 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM
862 Views
The explanations
- 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM
1119 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked
- 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM
1058 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then
- 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM
1981 Views
Re: The explanations
- 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM
799 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS...
- 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM
899 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS...
- 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM
979 Views
The reason is...
- 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM
927 Views
The reasoning is very weak.
- 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM
949 Views
If you mean...
- 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM
1018 Views
A few points
- 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM
858 Views
You are wrong...
- 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM
857 Views
Key word - "possibly"
- 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM
860 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear.
- 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM
826 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear.
- 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM
755 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad.
- 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM
842 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts"
- 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM
760 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV
- 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM
798 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit
- 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM
852 Views
You confuse it a bit...
- 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM
909 Views
I think you've got it backwards
- 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM
814 Views
However...
- 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM
845 Views
I wasn't arguing that point
- 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM
1082 Views
- 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM
1082 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear...
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM
805 Views
*NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM
805 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP.
- 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM
858 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense
- 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM
967 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections!
- 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM
914 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said...
- 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM
858 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case.
- 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM
821 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like...
- 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM
938 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts.
- 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM
999 Views
Actually...
- 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM
910 Views
BWB says...
- 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM
1149 Views
Well...
- 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM
969 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins
- 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM
873 Views
No...
- 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM
1080 Views
Re: No...
- 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM
1039 Views
Again...
- 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM
793 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen?
- 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM
821 Views
Again...
- 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM
764 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it.
- 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM
857 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM*
- 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM
436 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh*
- 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM
712 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it?
- 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM
934 Views
I don't say...
- 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM
1039 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC
- 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM
928 Views
Re: Well...
- 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM
841 Views
It becomes clear...
- 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM
765 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand
- 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM
1032 Views
As said...
- 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM
836 Views
Re: As said...
- 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM
827 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman...
- 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM
800 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM*
- 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM
490 Views
