Active Users:729 Time:07/11/2025 09:03:03 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM
I still don't see the logic of saying that someone couldn't have murdered another person many months ago just because that person may have been recently killed. Being killed doesn't negate actions you took in the past, and even the most powerful stream of balefire wouldn't undo her actions from months ago.

I just don't see anything beyond "Slayer slays things so he probably killed Asmodean! Oh, and he has powers!" to this theory. Sorry!
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Fain's Myrddraal Etzel - 28/12/2009 01:45:58 PM 1932 Views
Nope, Myrddraal have been nothing but cannon fodder since book four *NM* Lordling - 28/12/2009 03:01:01 PM 492 Views
except, of course, for Shaidar Haran *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 03:12:17 PM 485 Views
But what was the purpose then? Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:43:01 PM 884 Views
To show the relationship between Fain and DO Bonden - 28/12/2009 03:52:59 PM 840 Views
Maybe... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:02:42 PM 917 Views
Re: Maybe... Bonden - 29/12/2009 03:58:57 AM 1124 Views
Re: Fain's Myrddraal RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 03:19:37 PM 888 Views
Slayer also hunts Rand Etzel - 28/12/2009 03:57:11 PM 899 Views
I think it's possible that Slayer could have killed Asmo darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 04:35:57 PM 820 Views
The explanations Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:06:02 PM 1079 Views
Perhaps, I still don't buy it, but if that's the way it turns out I won't be shocked darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 05:20:06 PM 1003 Views
Your reaction would be similar to BS's then Etzel - 28/12/2009 05:57:44 PM 1951 Views
I don't really have a strong opinion on which suspect did it darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:03:07 PM 819 Views
Well... Etzel - 28/12/2009 06:42:16 PM 867 Views
Indeed *NM* darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 06:55:52 PM 437 Views
Re: The explanations RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 08:01:19 PM 746 Views
The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:13:07 PM 855 Views
Re: The case for Graendal was already weak before TGS... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:19:24 PM 923 Views
The reason is... Etzel - 29/12/2009 11:58:24 AM 893 Views
The reasoning is very weak. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:34:19 PM 896 Views
If you mean... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:01:25 PM 974 Views
A few points darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:14:12 PM 818 Views
You are wrong... Etzel - 29/12/2009 04:25:09 PM 818 Views
Thanks for the quote .. obviously hadn't heard that one before! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 04:31:37 PM 913 Views
Key word - "possibly" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:38:46 PM 820 Views
As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:06:47 PM 784 Views
Re: As said, if you just compare it to Alviarin's mark, it's clear. darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:08:09 PM 723 Views
Well, it protects you of Shadowspawn, not that bad. Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:12:04 PM 795 Views
I don't think what happened to Fain or Slayer are "gifts" darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:26:15 PM 726 Views
Slayer calls it "gifts" in his PoV Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:37:49 PM 766 Views
I think you are stretching the reality a bit darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:42:10 PM 806 Views
You confuse it a bit... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:57:07 PM 867 Views
I think you've got it backwards darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 07:12:02 PM 786 Views
However... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:16:08 PM 805 Views
I wasn't arguing that point darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:13:25 PM 1037 Views
Some things don't have to be spelled out, if they are that clear... *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:18:05 PM 760 Views
clearly they do since people are discussing it! darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:37:00 PM 747 Views
Yes; it is not readily apparant that the mark was made with the TP. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:07 PM 804 Views
Sorry, but that is utter nonsense Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:24:54 PM 925 Views
You are incorrect; I'm actually thinking that you only skimmed certain sections! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:38:37 PM 863 Views
Simply read the books and what the authors said... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:55:42 PM 806 Views
Sorry, I think you have an opinion and read everything to support it in this case. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:02:42 PM 780 Views
Ok, then we play dumb, if you like... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:14:58 PM 900 Views
Because the Dark One is not merely a super channeler. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:21:21 PM 915 Views
Well, I disagree of course... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:36:19 PM 1026 Views
You are mistaken on quite a few counts. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 04:37:51 PM 959 Views
Actually... Etzel - 29/12/2009 05:04:54 PM 864 Views
BWB says... darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 05:48:40 PM 1107 Views
Exactly. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:12:30 PM 414 Views
Well... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:18:08 PM 917 Views
Just pointing out that your comment about Lanfear and Moggy not being assassins darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 06:37:21 PM 811 Views
No... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:47:07 PM 1030 Views
Re: No... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:00:20 PM 986 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:10:12 PM 751 Views
So you dismiss the actual assassinations the Forsaken have performed on-screen? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 773 Views
Again... Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:47:57 PM 719 Views
I think any Forsaken is capable of doing it. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 08:05:10 PM 817 Views
Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:16:50 PM 684 Views
Re: Then another Forsaken, e.g. Sammael.. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 09:21:23 PM 785 Views
She kidnapped the Sharan's ... who's to say she hasn't killed others? *NM* darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 08:17:28 PM 413 Views
Yeah, after TFoH! We are looking for clues before LoC, guys! *sigh* Etzel - 29/12/2009 08:31:13 PM 663 Views
Where did I say this was a clue to her doing it? darius_sedai - 29/12/2009 09:58:29 PM 896 Views
I don't say... Etzel - 30/12/2009 12:08:27 PM 985 Views
Most of what you are talking about with Slayer is discoverd after LoC darius_sedai - 30/12/2009 02:36:18 PM 884 Views
Re: Well... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 06:41:29 PM 793 Views
It becomes clear... Etzel - 29/12/2009 06:59:03 PM 731 Views
Basically, you think Slayer killed him. I do not. Nor do I care. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 07:04:20 PM 695 Views
Fair enough. *NM* Etzel - 29/12/2009 07:17:22 PM 466 Views
Re: Slayer also hunts Rand RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 04:39:36 PM 996 Views
As said... Etzel - 28/12/2009 04:54:07 PM 796 Views
Re: As said... RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 07:49:22 PM 793 Views
It's rather the TP, which makes Slayer inhuman... Etzel - 28/12/2009 08:21:20 PM 756 Views
makes you wonder darius_sedai - 28/12/2009 09:45:08 PM 844 Views
Re: makes you wonder RugbyPlayingAshaman - 28/12/2009 10:16:57 PM 857 Views
I think... Etzel - 29/12/2009 12:03:41 PM 756 Views
Fain's Myrddraal killed asmo LOL *NM* aldapelan - 29/12/2009 05:26:22 AM 470 Views
It is quite obvious that it was Mistress Laras. *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 29/12/2009 03:35:36 PM 439 Views
Intuitively, even. *NM* Gher - 29/12/2009 06:03:13 PM 430 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes