Active Users:411 Time:02/05/2025 04:12:22 AM
The wording is absolutely unambiguous, but I suppose one can argue everything. *NM* Etzel Send a noteboard - 21/01/2010 05:24:03 PM
I'm not convinced that means anything. The wording itself is suspect. Mainly because he says "she's not under any shenanigans" yet what "we see" is a slight power deficiency.

He may simply be confused as to what Maria showed him. Is Cyndane truly weaker or has she not reached her full potential, yet? Strangely, noone comments on this. Does she ever reflect on her lost strength? Strangely, once again, she herself doesn't comment on this, and we only have observations from other, easily misdirected sources. Compared to Leane or Siuan, who readily gauge themselves to their lost ability in their POVs, Cyndane is a cipher.

This would satisfy me: Q: Is Cyndane weaker than she used to be as Lanfear? A: Yes, there is a difference in the channeling ability of the body she currently occupies - Lanfear's soul/body had the ability inborn, while Cyndane was a latent channeler...in this case the soul isn't fully reflected in the body, somewhat like Aviendha should be able to weave a larger Gateway with her strength than her block enables her to.

What we get instead is "What you see is what you get." which is annoying mainly because we, as readers, aren't quite sure what we are supposed to be seeing. This reminds me of the 'intuitively obvious' RAFO answers RJ used to use. My feeling is that they want Cyndane to remain a cipher, so don't really answer the question.
Reply to message
My Lanfear/Cyndane theory has been disproven. - 20/01/2010 05:12:58 PM 2857 Views
It was discussed - 20/01/2010 05:27:43 PM 1192 Views
Re: It was discussed - 20/01/2010 07:09:01 PM 976 Views
Maybe... - 20/01/2010 07:15:57 PM 915 Views
Re: Maybe... - 20/01/2010 08:53:47 PM 972 Views
Yeah, that would be a possibility! *NM* - 20/01/2010 09:01:26 PM 895 Views
That doesn't really jive with Aran'gar though - 20/01/2010 09:03:35 PM 910 Views
But... - 20/01/2010 09:11:47 PM 888 Views
I think it's pretty obvious that pretty much any man is going to be - 20/01/2010 09:41:40 PM 841 Views
The idea behind this theory is... - 21/01/2010 07:15:19 AM 1028 Views
Maybe there is a difference between male souls and female souls ... - 20/01/2010 09:35:57 PM 912 Views
Plausible - 20/01/2010 09:45:21 PM 1011 Views
Actually, I didn't mean to imply that my idea of female strength is related to body size ... - 20/01/2010 10:10:48 PM 890 Views
LOL ... I hear ya on that - 20/01/2010 10:17:02 PM 952 Views
I'm so pleased this theory is false! - 12/12/2010 05:00:06 PM 809 Views
people didn't like it when I proposed it - 20/01/2010 05:31:18 PM 1134 Views
Thanks. - 20/01/2010 08:36:58 PM 1027 Views
I don't like the idea that she was healed by a woman - 20/01/2010 05:48:19 PM 974 Views
I agree, and it seems unlikely that a new "better" method - 20/01/2010 06:07:04 PM 888 Views
It's NOT due to Stilling or Healing and it's NOT due to Cyndane's weaker body... - 20/01/2010 06:46:08 PM 1015 Views
I think Moiraine's gaining strength seems a little too LotR. - 20/01/2010 06:55:34 PM 923 Views
I also like that theory - 20/01/2010 07:14:20 PM 950 Views
I think BS's error regarding Cyndane's strength can also be explained by this theory... - 20/01/2010 07:17:59 PM 915 Views
Yes perhaps - 20/01/2010 07:25:06 PM 942 Views
Cadsuane is considerably stronger than Moiraine - 20/01/2010 07:31:42 PM 925 Views
Nope... - 20/01/2010 07:38:55 PM 903 Views
I disagree as usual - 20/01/2010 07:45:29 PM 814 Views
We don't know the magnitude of what Aes Sedai consider a significant strength difference... - 20/01/2010 07:54:38 PM 896 Views
You are comparing Male and female strength here - 20/01/2010 08:18:45 PM 948 Views
Why do you misquote Moiraine? - 20/01/2010 08:39:55 PM 918 Views
Cadsuane isn't too strong - 21/01/2010 04:19:41 AM 926 Views
Actually... - 21/01/2010 05:57:43 AM 909 Views
Re: Actually... - 21/01/2010 12:31:53 PM 937 Views
Sorry, that was the Glossary... - 21/01/2010 08:07:56 PM 825 Views
- 22/01/2010 11:05:23 AM 997 Views
So Glossary or character? - 22/01/2010 10:22:15 PM 698 Views
Re: Actually... - 12/12/2010 04:42:22 PM 940 Views
Re: I think BS's error regarding Cyndane's strength can also be explained by this theory... - 20/01/2010 07:43:28 PM 914 Views
Agree with both your comments... - 20/01/2010 07:46:07 PM 917 Views
Re: Agree with both your comments... - 20/01/2010 08:24:16 PM 970 Views
But seriously... - 21/01/2010 12:14:16 PM 808 Views
Re: But seriously... - 21/01/2010 12:34:18 PM 986 Views
I don't think it has to be so unique... - 21/01/2010 01:13:00 PM 938 Views
Re: I don't think it has to be so unique... - 21/01/2010 04:49:42 PM 939 Views
Also would explain the question of why Moiraine left the angreal on the wagon instead of using it... - 21/01/2010 02:30:46 PM 917 Views
I think it makes more sense... - 21/01/2010 02:34:30 PM 943 Views
Lanfear would have been toast if Moiraine had the angreal, plus foreknowledge of the confrontation.. - 21/01/2010 02:38:57 PM 915 Views
In her letter to Thom - 21/01/2010 02:55:32 PM 934 Views
One other tiny thing - 21/01/2010 03:18:03 PM 875 Views
Yes, and that is often overlooked - 21/01/2010 04:48:08 PM 824 Views
That's my interpretation, also ... - 21/01/2010 04:00:35 PM 802 Views
Nods in agreement - 21/01/2010 06:24:59 PM 958 Views
I think the "bubble of hope" was simply ... - 21/01/2010 07:08:44 PM 751 Views
Agreed *NM* - 21/01/2010 11:38:43 PM 533 Views
No, I don't think so - 21/01/2010 04:43:53 PM 994 Views
I always figured Lanfear bargained away some power to escape the Finns - 20/01/2010 07:37:31 PM 915 Views
But... - 20/01/2010 07:50:14 PM 953 Views
Re: My Lanfear/Cyndane theory has been disproven. - 20/01/2010 07:51:38 PM 1176 Views
That idea has also been disproven ... - 20/01/2010 08:19:22 PM 1035 Views
Agreed... - 20/01/2010 08:36:47 PM 805 Views
Yeah ... - 20/01/2010 08:43:24 PM 951 Views
The closest I ever saw was the "Lightfriend/Purple Ajah" theory - 20/01/2010 08:46:20 PM 1189 Views
Yeah, the Verin revelation was cool... - 20/01/2010 08:48:53 PM 901 Views
Re: That idea has also been disproven ... - 21/01/2010 05:12:45 PM 886 Views
I think it may be more simple than it seems. - 21/01/2010 04:15:05 PM 1009 Views
Doesn't fit with BS's words - 21/01/2010 04:27:43 PM 836 Views
Also ... - 21/01/2010 04:32:58 PM 805 Views
I don't think BS words or Cyndane's comments really prove anything. - 21/01/2010 04:42:59 PM 945 Views
BS says that Cyndane is truly weaker. So, this theory is out. *NM* - 21/01/2010 04:46:48 PM 577 Views
Re: BS says that Cyndane is truly weaker. So, this theory is out. - 21/01/2010 04:49:09 PM 924 Views
Well, actually - 21/01/2010 04:54:17 PM 843 Views
Re: Well, actually - 21/01/2010 05:11:10 PM 853 Views
The wording is absolutely unambiguous, but I suppose one can argue everything. *NM* - 21/01/2010 05:24:03 PM 600 Views
Re: The wording is absolutely unambiguous, but I suppose one can argue everything. - 21/01/2010 06:07:09 PM 1169 Views
I agree - 21/01/2010 06:23:34 PM 929 Views
Re: I agree - 21/01/2010 07:59:36 PM 927 Views
Re: I agree - 22/01/2010 07:23:37 AM 834 Views
Re: I agree - 22/01/2010 11:11:55 AM 1012 Views
I think... - 21/01/2010 06:46:57 PM 876 Views
Re: I think... - 21/01/2010 06:58:49 PM 773 Views
You are right... - 21/01/2010 07:12:47 PM 871 Views
Re: You are right... - 21/01/2010 07:21:00 PM 978 Views
Anyone who thinks she's hiding her strength is wrong - 21/01/2010 08:09:42 PM 1148 Views
Indeed, it's pretty idiotic. *NM* - 21/01/2010 08:19:53 PM 484 Views
Dude... - 21/01/2010 08:51:08 PM 919 Views
Re: Dude... - 22/01/2010 11:14:08 AM 948 Views
Re: Dude... - 22/01/2010 10:21:15 PM 1091 Views
Meh - 21/01/2010 11:19:16 PM 781 Views
Re: Meh - 22/01/2010 11:15:20 AM 925 Views
Re: Meh - 22/01/2010 03:09:10 PM 867 Views
Re: Meh - 22/01/2010 04:15:51 PM 891 Views
actually if one really wants to figure out what happened to Cyndane - 21/01/2010 07:00:33 PM 1065 Views
Dumb question, but do transmigrated souls need to re-reach their full potential? - 21/01/2010 06:19:57 PM 918 Views
It seems like they start out as powerful as they were, but I don't think it's ever been stated *NM* - 21/01/2010 06:44:45 PM 571 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 21/01/2010 07:03:13 PM 496 Views
That's what I thought. *NM* - 21/01/2010 10:05:38 PM 518 Views

Reply to Message