Active Users:330 Time:28/06/2025 06:16:58 PM
Re: The To'Raken Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 06/04/2010 06:00:07 AM
An example of this, on a very small scale, would be Egwene killing the to’raken carrying away Aes Sedai prisoners from the Tower. She thinks highly of the Tower and sees these women as her subjects and her responsibility, or as her possessions and adornments to her power, depending on your view of her. However, she has to do what is best for the Tower and the world, and that means killing Seanchan forces and doing what she can to cripple their war machine. If some of her daughters/pets/minions have to die with them, too damn bad. But that example is one of battle where the lines of life and death are clearly drawn, and even right and wrong gives way to a much simpler delineation: “them and us.”


Did Egwene have any reason to suspect that any of them knew Travelling? Even if she did, it's a big assumption to think she could kill ALL of the raken - for all she knew, by the time she entered the battle, Elaida had already been captured.

In terms of the AS becoming damane - they are still held by the Oaths, plus they, well, pretty much suck at combat. If they heal Seanchan soldiers, I don't think that's such a big deal. And in the timeframe before T'G (I doubt it's more than a month, or two at most) there's little chance that the captive AS would be completely broken to the point they couldn't be "reclaimed" back into the WT. I'd actually go as far as saying their emprisonment could be GOOD for the light - it's not unreasonable to think that Rand and Tuon will form some kind of alliance before the LB, and when they do, they'll have a few hundred extra trained damane who have learned combat weaves and whose Oaths still allow them to kill Shadowspawn. Which, I think you'll agree, is better than them sitting in the tower studying poetry. Their capture doesn't reflect well on Egwene, but her compassion/pity in sparing their lives might make a big difference in the end.
This message last edited by Lord Haart on 06/04/2010 at 06:00:28 AM
Reply to message
Did the characters come too easily to power? - 16/03/2010 11:37:31 PM 1987 Views
hehe I think I fell asleep during that read :p *NM* - 17/03/2010 01:12:55 AM 426 Views
Yes, and for Rand at least IMO, playing nice has cost dearly - 17/03/2010 04:59:32 AM 1002 Views
Not necessarily - 18/03/2010 03:17:10 PM 942 Views
Good post. - 27/03/2010 01:43:24 PM 799 Views
Unfortunately, no. - 31/03/2010 10:23:58 AM 914 Views
Re: Unfortunately, no. - 02/04/2010 07:54:10 AM 741 Views
All the way through, up to ripping her self-delusional assessments of her "achievements" in KoD - 02/04/2010 09:27:54 PM 816 Views
A shame I missed it, then - 04/04/2010 08:55:40 AM 810 Views
Re: A shame I missed it, then - 10/04/2010 08:17:38 AM 786 Views
Cliffs notes anyone? *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:31:02 AM 1528 Views
TLDR *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:43:01 AM 615 Views
Trolloc luRns da Reeading? - 17/03/2010 08:27:23 AM 1040 Views
Too long, didnt read *NM* - 17/03/2010 04:23:34 PM 374 Views
Cmon ppl pls reply to this, Cannoli has spent such a long time writing it.... I couldn't be bothered *NM* - 17/03/2010 10:31:38 AM 395 Views
*NM* - 17/03/2010 10:32:04 AM 403 Views
Re: Did the characters come too easily to power? - 17/03/2010 01:38:02 PM 918 Views
Thank you *NM* - 18/03/2010 03:17:52 PM 480 Views
I agree, very well written and thought out. - 19/03/2010 07:32:59 AM 863 Views
I did read it and it was good - 17/03/2010 02:33:26 PM 801 Views
I agree... *NM* - 17/03/2010 02:48:19 PM 419 Views
That depends on certain interpretations... - 18/03/2010 03:29:15 PM 1024 Views
Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 02:49:55 PM 904 Views
Re: Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 06:15:18 PM 854 Views
I agree - 18/03/2010 03:35:05 PM 974 Views
Strong vs. Hard in other words - 19/03/2010 05:10:41 AM 847 Views
Loooong *NM* - 17/03/2010 03:52:25 PM 452 Views
Look who's talking - look at how you write "long" ! - 18/03/2010 02:06:42 PM 762 Views
Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 05:35:08 PM 860 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 10:08:34 PM 981 Views
Oh and I forgot to add - 18/03/2010 01:41:28 AM 895 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 18/03/2010 03:37:09 PM 877 Views
I think this is an excellent analysis - 18/03/2010 01:56:33 PM 930 Views
Thanks. *NM* - 18/03/2010 04:28:52 PM 448 Views
While most of this is true... - 19/03/2010 06:47:19 AM 784 Views
Siuan's failure to properly help Rand should motivate Egwene to overthrow...oh, right. Egwene. - 19/03/2010 11:52:10 PM 813 Views
What do you mean by "properly"? - 20/03/2010 07:57:26 AM 773 Views
She did that because the Black Ajah was her personal boogeyman - 20/03/2010 09:58:54 AM 959 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 06/04/2010 06:00:07 AM 846 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 07/04/2010 11:31:47 PM 1052 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 09/04/2010 06:22:38 AM 769 Views

Reply to Message