Active Users:610 Time:26/08/2025 06:07:53 PM
Re: The To'Raken Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 06/04/2010 06:00:07 AM
An example of this, on a very small scale, would be Egwene killing the to’raken carrying away Aes Sedai prisoners from the Tower. She thinks highly of the Tower and sees these women as her subjects and her responsibility, or as her possessions and adornments to her power, depending on your view of her. However, she has to do what is best for the Tower and the world, and that means killing Seanchan forces and doing what she can to cripple their war machine. If some of her daughters/pets/minions have to die with them, too damn bad. But that example is one of battle where the lines of life and death are clearly drawn, and even right and wrong gives way to a much simpler delineation: “them and us.”


Did Egwene have any reason to suspect that any of them knew Travelling? Even if she did, it's a big assumption to think she could kill ALL of the raken - for all she knew, by the time she entered the battle, Elaida had already been captured.

In terms of the AS becoming damane - they are still held by the Oaths, plus they, well, pretty much suck at combat. If they heal Seanchan soldiers, I don't think that's such a big deal. And in the timeframe before T'G (I doubt it's more than a month, or two at most) there's little chance that the captive AS would be completely broken to the point they couldn't be "reclaimed" back into the WT. I'd actually go as far as saying their emprisonment could be GOOD for the light - it's not unreasonable to think that Rand and Tuon will form some kind of alliance before the LB, and when they do, they'll have a few hundred extra trained damane who have learned combat weaves and whose Oaths still allow them to kill Shadowspawn. Which, I think you'll agree, is better than them sitting in the tower studying poetry. Their capture doesn't reflect well on Egwene, but her compassion/pity in sparing their lives might make a big difference in the end.
This message last edited by Lord Haart on 06/04/2010 at 06:00:28 AM
Reply to message
Did the characters come too easily to power? - 16/03/2010 11:37:31 PM 2006 Views
hehe I think I fell asleep during that read :p *NM* - 17/03/2010 01:12:55 AM 436 Views
Yes, and for Rand at least IMO, playing nice has cost dearly - 17/03/2010 04:59:32 AM 1020 Views
Not necessarily - 18/03/2010 03:17:10 PM 965 Views
Good post. - 27/03/2010 01:43:24 PM 818 Views
Unfortunately, no. - 31/03/2010 10:23:58 AM 935 Views
Re: Unfortunately, no. - 02/04/2010 07:54:10 AM 761 Views
All the way through, up to ripping her self-delusional assessments of her "achievements" in KoD - 02/04/2010 09:27:54 PM 838 Views
A shame I missed it, then - 04/04/2010 08:55:40 AM 831 Views
Re: A shame I missed it, then - 10/04/2010 08:17:38 AM 809 Views
Cliffs notes anyone? *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:31:02 AM 1539 Views
TLDR *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:43:01 AM 625 Views
Trolloc luRns da Reeading? - 17/03/2010 08:27:23 AM 1071 Views
Too long, didnt read *NM* - 17/03/2010 04:23:34 PM 385 Views
Cmon ppl pls reply to this, Cannoli has spent such a long time writing it.... I couldn't be bothered *NM* - 17/03/2010 10:31:38 AM 404 Views
*NM* - 17/03/2010 10:32:04 AM 412 Views
Re: Did the characters come too easily to power? - 17/03/2010 01:38:02 PM 941 Views
Thank you *NM* - 18/03/2010 03:17:52 PM 489 Views
I agree, very well written and thought out. - 19/03/2010 07:32:59 AM 890 Views
I did read it and it was good - 17/03/2010 02:33:26 PM 818 Views
I agree... *NM* - 17/03/2010 02:48:19 PM 428 Views
That depends on certain interpretations... - 18/03/2010 03:29:15 PM 1046 Views
Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 02:49:55 PM 924 Views
Re: Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 06:15:18 PM 875 Views
I agree - 18/03/2010 03:35:05 PM 996 Views
Strong vs. Hard in other words - 19/03/2010 05:10:41 AM 870 Views
Loooong *NM* - 17/03/2010 03:52:25 PM 460 Views
Look who's talking - look at how you write "long" ! - 18/03/2010 02:06:42 PM 783 Views
Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 05:35:08 PM 878 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 10:08:34 PM 1003 Views
Oh and I forgot to add - 18/03/2010 01:41:28 AM 913 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 18/03/2010 03:37:09 PM 896 Views
I think this is an excellent analysis - 18/03/2010 01:56:33 PM 952 Views
Thanks. *NM* - 18/03/2010 04:28:52 PM 459 Views
While most of this is true... - 19/03/2010 06:47:19 AM 807 Views
Siuan's failure to properly help Rand should motivate Egwene to overthrow...oh, right. Egwene. - 19/03/2010 11:52:10 PM 833 Views
What do you mean by "properly"? - 20/03/2010 07:57:26 AM 795 Views
She did that because the Black Ajah was her personal boogeyman - 20/03/2010 09:58:54 AM 979 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 06/04/2010 06:00:07 AM 864 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 07/04/2010 11:31:47 PM 1071 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 09/04/2010 06:22:38 AM 793 Views

Reply to Message