Active Users:1026 Time:28/06/2025 05:29:11 PM
Re: The To'Raken orius Send a noteboard - 09/04/2010 06:22:38 AM
And given all else that has been discovered or recovered, how far are you willing to bet the Seanchan cannot find a way aroud the Oaths, or uses for Aes Sedai that allow more combat-capable damane to go to the front. My own personal opinion is that channelers contribute better to warfare away from the front lines of battles. Granted, the way in which the Seanchan use their damane limits most of the support functions at which channelers can be so useful, but they are the most professional and creative military institution in the known world - they can definitely find uses for the restricted damane.


They can probably use them for Healing, note that Tuon finds Healing to be very useful. From a military PoV, Healing will allow the wounded to get back into action in only a few days at most, compared to weeks or months for recupery. And Healing can also save the lives of soldiers who would die from what would be a fatal injury.

And then there's Travelling. Note Egwene's biggest concern was preventing the Seanchan from learning that at all costs, since they'd just be able to Travel right inside the WT at will. The Seanchan would definitely be able to use Travelling to their advantage. "Would" should probably be "will" since Elaida was stupid enough to get captured and she knows the weave.

Even the Oaths aren't a serious hindrance. All the Seanchan have to do is put former AS damane in harm's way where they can channel. I don't see them doing this with more valuable AS like Yellows who will be better at Healing, strong sisters who can make gateways well, or AS who have a broad set of skills that would be better use to teach other damane.

It is simply tough luck for any sisters who plunge to their deaths aboard them.


I'd say it's their fault for forgetting the weave for Flying, but in all fairness they probably wouldn't be able to use it properly while collared.
Reply to message
Did the characters come too easily to power? - 16/03/2010 11:37:31 PM 1986 Views
hehe I think I fell asleep during that read :p *NM* - 17/03/2010 01:12:55 AM 426 Views
Yes, and for Rand at least IMO, playing nice has cost dearly - 17/03/2010 04:59:32 AM 1001 Views
Not necessarily - 18/03/2010 03:17:10 PM 942 Views
Good post. - 27/03/2010 01:43:24 PM 798 Views
Unfortunately, no. - 31/03/2010 10:23:58 AM 913 Views
Re: Unfortunately, no. - 02/04/2010 07:54:10 AM 740 Views
All the way through, up to ripping her self-delusional assessments of her "achievements" in KoD - 02/04/2010 09:27:54 PM 816 Views
A shame I missed it, then - 04/04/2010 08:55:40 AM 810 Views
Re: A shame I missed it, then - 10/04/2010 08:17:38 AM 786 Views
Cliffs notes anyone? *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:31:02 AM 1528 Views
TLDR *NM* - 17/03/2010 05:43:01 AM 615 Views
Trolloc luRns da Reeading? - 17/03/2010 08:27:23 AM 1040 Views
Too long, didnt read *NM* - 17/03/2010 04:23:34 PM 374 Views
Cmon ppl pls reply to this, Cannoli has spent such a long time writing it.... I couldn't be bothered *NM* - 17/03/2010 10:31:38 AM 395 Views
*NM* - 17/03/2010 10:32:04 AM 403 Views
Re: Did the characters come too easily to power? - 17/03/2010 01:38:02 PM 917 Views
Thank you *NM* - 18/03/2010 03:17:52 PM 480 Views
I agree, very well written and thought out. - 19/03/2010 07:32:59 AM 863 Views
I did read it and it was good - 17/03/2010 02:33:26 PM 800 Views
I agree... *NM* - 17/03/2010 02:48:19 PM 419 Views
That depends on certain interpretations... - 18/03/2010 03:29:15 PM 1024 Views
Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 02:49:55 PM 903 Views
Re: Rand is at the perfect position after TGS for his downfall... - 17/03/2010 06:15:18 PM 853 Views
I agree - 18/03/2010 03:35:05 PM 973 Views
Strong vs. Hard in other words - 19/03/2010 05:10:41 AM 847 Views
Loooong *NM* - 17/03/2010 03:52:25 PM 452 Views
Look who's talking - look at how you write "long" ! - 18/03/2010 02:06:42 PM 761 Views
Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 05:35:08 PM 859 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 17/03/2010 10:08:34 PM 981 Views
Oh and I forgot to add - 18/03/2010 01:41:28 AM 894 Views
Re: Sheesh, you people are babies. I read it. Some good points. - 18/03/2010 03:37:09 PM 876 Views
I think this is an excellent analysis - 18/03/2010 01:56:33 PM 930 Views
Thanks. *NM* - 18/03/2010 04:28:52 PM 448 Views
While most of this is true... - 19/03/2010 06:47:19 AM 783 Views
Siuan's failure to properly help Rand should motivate Egwene to overthrow...oh, right. Egwene. - 19/03/2010 11:52:10 PM 813 Views
What do you mean by "properly"? - 20/03/2010 07:57:26 AM 773 Views
She did that because the Black Ajah was her personal boogeyman - 20/03/2010 09:58:54 AM 959 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 06/04/2010 06:00:07 AM 845 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 07/04/2010 11:31:47 PM 1051 Views
Re: The To'Raken - 09/04/2010 06:22:38 AM 769 Views

Reply to Message