Active Users:729 Time:19/12/2025 02:00:37 AM
Re: Sometimes, but not usually Camilla Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM
Right now I'm reading two books. I try to focus on one because if I don't do that, I will end up in a situation where I haven't read anything the whole way through. Sometimes I stop reading a particular book for a month or more and put it back on the shelf with the bookmark still in it. There are about three books like that on my shelves right now. I'll finish them. The reasons I haven't finished them? Simple: one is a two-volume religious work, one is about the Russian mafia and ultimately gets depressing when read for too long and one is written in Middle English so I don't read it fast or like to read it at one sitting (I've been reading the Canterbury Tales in Middle English for some time now, one story at a time).



Sounds sensible. Most of my pending books are also either theory or long works that are unrelated to what I should be doing.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were? - 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM 1928 Views
I'm reading three books right now. - 23/09/2009 09:30:53 AM 1662 Views
I am on 20 - 23/09/2009 10:00:39 AM 1433 Views
Yes - 23/09/2009 09:41:31 AM 1629 Views
Re: Yes - 23/09/2009 09:59:16 AM 1528 Views
Not really - 23/09/2009 06:10:18 PM 1633 Views
I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM 1511 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore - 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM 1549 Views
Hmm - 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM 1518 Views
Re: Hmm - 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM 1490 Views
I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:38:14 PM 1554 Views
Re: I am sensing a trend in your posts - 24/09/2009 02:39:47 PM 1330 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM 1516 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 23/09/2009 01:17:05 PM 1503 Views
Re: I try not to read more than a couple books at a time - 05/10/2009 09:17:10 AM 1634 Views
Yes. - 23/09/2009 12:17:14 PM 1431 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 01:17:41 PM 1487 Views
Re: Yes. - 23/09/2009 02:55:43 PM 1425 Views
Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 12:44:45 PM 1517 Views
Re: Pretty much. Although I will give in to temptation. - 23/09/2009 01:18:58 PM 1534 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM 1394 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books - 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM 1458 Views
If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:26:06 PM 1391 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 02:38:59 PM 1552 Views
Re: If I have my way - 23/09/2009 03:15:12 PM 1386 Views
Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 01:49:00 PM 1518 Views
Re: Depends on the book. - 23/09/2009 02:36:23 PM 1459 Views
Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:56:47 PM 1469 Views
Re: Usually two books at once. - 23/09/2009 02:58:28 PM 1438 Views
Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM 1417 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually - 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM 1400 Views
Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:15:30 PM 1464 Views
Re: Usually. - 23/09/2009 03:17:35 PM 1498 Views
It sucks, believe me. - 02/10/2009 03:46:47 PM 1919 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now - 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM 1480 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now. - 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM 1550 Views
It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM 1402 Views
Re: It does sound really good - 23/09/2009 07:55:27 PM 1500 Views
Bought it. - 24/09/2009 04:13:44 PM 1419 Views
Re: Bought it. - 24/09/2009 05:39:16 PM 1457 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour. - 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM 1446 Views
Pfff, dream on *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:44:22 PM 734 Views
Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM 1434 Views
Re: Highly monogamous - 23/09/2009 05:31:04 PM 1476 Views
some of them are starting to feel neglected, though. - 23/09/2009 05:44:23 PM 1517 Views
This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM 1478 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing - 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM 1513 Views
best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM 1500 Views
Re: best place for it. - 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM 1342 Views
that's a weird argument. - 23/09/2009 08:31:01 PM 1486 Views
Re: that's a weird argument. - 24/09/2009 09:18:57 AM 1421 Views
I was about to reply with something similar. - 23/09/2009 05:52:07 PM 1491 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM 1560 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books. - 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM 1439 Views
That it is. - 23/09/2009 11:24:45 PM 1402 Views
hells no - 23/09/2009 07:27:49 PM 1441 Views
Sensible *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:54:22 PM 611 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM 1349 Views
Re: Yes. The exceptions are relatively few. - 23/09/2009 07:55:06 PM 1341 Views
I don't read books I find boring unless I'm required to. - 23/09/2009 11:36:17 PM 1422 Views
nope - 23/09/2009 07:58:53 PM 1323 Views
Re: nope - 24/09/2009 09:18:28 AM 1400 Views
RT stole my post title. - 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM 1547 Views
Re: RT stole my post title. - 24/09/2009 09:54:13 AM 1333 Views
Well - 24/09/2009 08:00:12 PM 1655 Views
Re: Well - 25/09/2009 09:31:29 AM 1815 Views
Very Monogamous - 23/09/2009 11:02:32 PM 1594 Views
Re: Very Monogamous - 24/09/2009 09:55:50 AM 1486 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy. - 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM 1459 Views
In all things, or just marriage and books? *NM* - 24/09/2009 10:03:21 AM 715 Views
In principle I have nothing against multiple spouses. - 24/09/2009 11:08:49 PM 1410 Views
Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM 1507 Views
Re: Totally slutty - 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM 1534 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM 1335 Views
Re: - 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM 1312 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM 1363 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though! - 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM 1532 Views
That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM 1459 Views
Re: That does not exist for me - 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM 1329 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one - 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM 1432 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe - 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM 1466 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no? - 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM 1592 Views
where? - 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM 1368 Views
Here - 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM 1508 Views
I have of course read A Study in Emerald - 24/09/2009 03:48:45 PM 1427 Views
That's the earlier anthology - 24/09/2009 03:56:42 PM 1390 Views
Sort of - 24/09/2009 12:30:04 AM 1443 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 10:05:07 AM 1435 Views
Re: Sort of - 24/09/2009 02:27:14 PM 1462 Views
Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 04:43:06 AM 1495 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 24/09/2009 10:06:10 AM 1450 Views
Re: Yes and no. - 26/09/2009 05:06:07 PM 1648 Views
No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 06:22:24 AM 1440 Views
Re: No, not at all. - 24/09/2009 10:08:26 AM 1577 Views
Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM 1455 Views
Re: Usually I read one at a time. - 24/09/2009 02:59:42 PM 1495 Views
No, confusion has nothing to do with it. - 25/09/2009 02:08:16 PM 1567 Views
mmm, polyamory! - 24/09/2009 05:48:04 PM 1410 Views
People must understand that we have urges that cannot always be - 24/09/2009 05:49:25 PM 1333 Views
I used to only read one at a time - 24/09/2009 08:46:46 PM 1580 Views
Re: I used to only read one at a time - 25/09/2009 09:33:30 AM 1516 Views
Only read One book at a time. You make me feel bad. - 25/09/2009 02:44:51 AM 1392 Views
On behalf of my books? - 25/09/2009 09:40:37 AM 1283 Views
Honestly, - 25/09/2009 03:07:53 AM 1538 Views
Re: Honestly, - 25/09/2009 09:42:04 AM 1414 Views
I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 04:50:48 PM 1491 Views
Re: I like to read around, yeah - 25/09/2009 07:05:21 PM 1561 Views
No - 02/10/2009 05:02:51 PM 1491 Views
Re: No - 02/10/2009 07:45:39 PM 1578 Views

Reply to Message