Right now I'm reading two books. I try to focus on one because if I don't do that, I will end up in a situation where I haven't read anything the whole way through. Sometimes I stop reading a particular book for a month or more and put it back on the shelf with the bookmark still in it. There are about three books like that on my shelves right now. I'll finish them. The reasons I haven't finished them? Simple: one is a two-volume religious work, one is about the Russian mafia and ultimately gets depressing when read for too long and one is written in Middle English so I don't read it fast or like to read it at one sitting (I've been reading the Canterbury Tales in Middle English for some time now, one story at a time).
Sounds sensible. Most of my pending books are also either theory or long works that are unrelated to what I should be doing.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
2042 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1623 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1649 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1621 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1584 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1624 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1478 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1566 Views
Sometimes, but not usually
- 23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM
1515 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually
- 23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM
1500 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1580 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1674 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1512 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1538 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1538 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1541 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1565 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1617 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1616 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1446 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1699 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1539 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
878 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
826 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1452 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1665 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1562 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1609 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1644 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1420 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1420 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1412 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1412 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1464 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1631 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1582 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1582 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1423 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1423 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1537 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1556 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1711 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1453 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1624 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1552 Views



