Right now I'm reading two books. I try to focus on one because if I don't do that, I will end up in a situation where I haven't read anything the whole way through. Sometimes I stop reading a particular book for a month or more and put it back on the shelf with the bookmark still in it. There are about three books like that on my shelves right now. I'll finish them. The reasons I haven't finished them? Simple: one is a two-volume religious work, one is about the Russian mafia and ultimately gets depressing when read for too long and one is written in Middle English so I don't read it fast or like to read it at one sitting (I've been reading the Canterbury Tales in Middle English for some time now, one story at a time).
Sounds sensible. Most of my pending books are also either theory or long works that are unrelated to what I should be doing.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
- 1824 Views
I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
- 1409 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
- 1448 Views
Hmm
23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
- 1423 Views
Re: Hmm
24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
- 1392 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
- 1354 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
- 1296 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
- 1361 Views
Sometimes, but not usually
23/09/2009 03:14:02 PM
- 1303 Views
Re: Sometimes, but not usually
23/09/2009 03:16:42 PM
- 1290 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
- 1378 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
- 1439 Views
It does sound really good
23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
- 1280 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
- 1340 Views

Highly monogamous
23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
- 1331 Views
This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
- 1372 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
- 1406 Views
best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
- 1399 Views
Re: best place for it.
23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
- 1232 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
- 1431 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
- 1343 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
- 779 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
- 736 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
- 1246 Views
RT stole my post title.
23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
- 1452 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
- 1365 Views
Totally slutty
24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
- 1412 Views
Re: Totally slutty
24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
- 1436 Views
24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
- 1250 Views

Re:
24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
- 1212 Views

It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
- 1251 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
- 1421 Views
That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
- 1350 Views

Re: That does not exist for me
24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
- 1229 Views

I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
- 1315 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
- 1382 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
- 1494 Views
where?
24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
- 1264 Views
Here
24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
- 1395 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
- 1354 Views