Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced? 

Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
1928 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1511 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1549 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1518 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1490 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1516 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1394 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1458 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1480 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1549 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1402 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1446 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1446 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1434 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1478 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1512 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1499 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1341 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1560 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1439 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
833 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
784 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1348 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1547 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1459 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1506 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1534 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1335 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1335 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1312 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1312 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1363 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1532 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1459 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1459 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1329 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1329 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1430 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1466 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1592 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1368 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1508 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1455 Views



