Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced? 

Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
Of course, I didn't think Adams' last few stories were all that great, so I'm curious to see if there's any improvement here

Think Dune, Larry. Surely you know the pain.
I'll just think of Neil Gaiman writing a Sherlock Holmes mystery

That is very different.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
2093 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1676 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1709 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1681 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1637 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1675 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1532 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1619 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1644 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1731 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1567 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1595 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1595 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1601 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1641 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1679 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1678 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1510 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1753 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1590 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
919 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
867 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1493 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1723 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1623 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1663 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1698 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1478 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1478 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1470 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1470 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1514 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1700 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1638 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1638 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1479 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1479 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1617 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1605 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1799 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1520 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1688 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1607 Views



