Well, there was that South Carolina author who wrote some extensions of a Texas author's famous short stories involving a certain barbarian, yet he seemed to have done well for himself. Would you have slapped that South Carolina author as well, if you hadn't read what else he had produced? 

Nah. I don't care about Conan. There would have been other reasons for slapping RJ. I only care here because Adams is a treasure and they are prostituting him.
Of course, I didn't think Adams' last few stories were all that great, so I'm curious to see if there's any improvement here

Think Dune, Larry. Surely you know the pain.
I'll just think of Neil Gaiman writing a Sherlock Holmes mystery

That is very different.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Are you a "monogamous" reader, as it were?
- 23/09/2009 08:57:37 AM
2013 Views
I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:53:41 AM
1599 Views
Re: I used to be a book-whore
- 23/09/2009 09:58:28 AM
1626 Views
Hmm
- 23/09/2009 08:59:29 PM
1598 Views
Re: Hmm
- 24/09/2009 09:20:32 AM
1562 Views
I try not to read more than a couple books at a time
- 23/09/2009 10:41:13 AM
1601 Views
Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:03:52 PM
1459 Views
Re: Hey man, don't try to put labels on what is going on with me and my books
- 23/09/2009 01:19:18 PM
1541 Views
Monogamous? I am not even "in a relationship" right now
- 23/09/2009 03:39:42 PM
1556 Views
Go read The Gone-Away World. Now.
- 23/09/2009 03:42:25 PM
1641 Views
It does sound really good
- 23/09/2009 07:45:44 PM
1484 Views
I just want you to know that I changed my signature in your honour.
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1520 Views
- 23/09/2009 03:49:20 PM
1520 Views
Highly monogamous
- 23/09/2009 04:54:29 PM
1521 Views
This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:48:43 PM
1542 Views
Re: This might be a Male thing
- 23/09/2009 05:49:54 PM
1593 Views
best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:21:52 PM
1593 Views
Re: best place for it.
- 23/09/2009 07:53:42 PM
1422 Views
Usually monogamous, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:02:58 PM
1671 Views
Re: Usually monogomaus, except when it comes to exceedingly boring books.
- 23/09/2009 06:23:51 PM
1516 Views
For the most part. Not always, but then it usually ends up with me divorcing the first book. *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:17:32 PM
869 Views
Shocking. I hope you give it some sort of financial support, at least? *NM*
- 23/09/2009 07:53:11 PM
818 Views
Yes. The exceptions are relatively few.
- 23/09/2009 07:42:07 PM
1424 Views
RT stole my post title.
- 23/09/2009 09:04:37 PM
1642 Views
Monogamy over Polygamy.
- 23/09/2009 11:22:30 PM
1542 Views
Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 12:06:06 AM
1588 Views
Re: Totally slutty
- 24/09/2009 10:04:27 AM
1623 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1404 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:01:48 PM
1404 Views
Re:
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1387 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:13:03 PM
1387 Views
It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:19:50 PM
1440 Views
Re: It's a time-honored thing, though!
- 24/09/2009 02:22:58 PM
1609 Views
That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1560 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:35:15 PM
1560 Views
Re: That does not exist for me
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1406 Views
- 24/09/2009 02:36:12 PM
1406 Views
I like to think that the current case will be closer to that than to the Dune one
- 24/09/2009 02:49:03 PM
1504 Views
Gaiman wasn't writing in Conan Doyle's universe
- 24/09/2009 02:51:17 PM
1531 Views
But he certainly wrote for an anthology of Holmesian stories, no?
- 24/09/2009 02:54:48 PM
1668 Views
where?
- 24/09/2009 02:58:40 PM
1434 Views
Here
- 24/09/2009 03:07:55 PM
1602 Views
Usually I read one at a time.
- 24/09/2009 01:31:03 PM
1525 Views



