Active Users:152 Time:01/06/2024 09:42:33 AM
That is a very confusing article. Legolas Send a noteboard - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM
Every year, January 1st is "public domain day" around the globe. It's the day when all works that have had their copyrights expire enter the public domain, since copyright term is based on the year of publication, rather than the exact date. While some parts of the world still have something to celebrate on public domain day -- such as how the works of James Joyce are now in the public domain in the EU, here in the US as we've noted in the past, we're left waiting... for nothing. Because thanks to massive changes to copyright law, as well as copyright term extension, absolutely nothing has or will enter the public domain for many years in the US (minus a specific declaration by the copyright holder... and even then it's not entirely clear that qualifies).

See, after this paragraph I want to know whether, how and why the US deviates from what I thought was the general rule (with the odd exception in some less important country here or there) of things being released to the public domain seventy years after death of author/composer/whatever.

Oh wait, I think I get it now... the US does not deviate from that rule at all, but the point is merely that due to the law having changed at some point in the relatively recent past, the net effect is that for the next few decades nothing will enter the public domain because the works that normally *would* be entering public domain after seventy years after death of author, are already in it thanks to the looser rules before.

Seems a bit silly to be whining about nothing entering the public domain, then, and especially silly to make that comparison to the EU, as they use the exact same public domain rules as the US now.
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 1755 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 892 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 822 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 826 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 876 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 845 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 878 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 480 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 616 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1110 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 919 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 854 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1002 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 851 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 883 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 795 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 882 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1272 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 810 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1426 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 935 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 874 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 821 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 371 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 966 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 408 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 803 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 846 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 971 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 872 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 966 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 868 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 900 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1043 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 990 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 792 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 977 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1079 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 841 Views

Reply to Message