Active Users:1736 Time:02/07/2026 01:28:35 PM
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM
Also: I wouldn't call them parodies. They're more reworkings.
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
This message last edited by Rebekah on 04/01/2012 at 10:33:21 PM
Reply to message
Why Johnny Can't Read Any New Public Domain Books In The US: Because Nothing New Entered The P.D. - 03/01/2012 11:33:34 PM 2080 Views
I find it difficult to see this as stealing rights from the public. - 04/01/2012 11:15:35 AM 1193 Views
Are you arguing for illegal use of legally protected works? - 04/01/2012 09:34:18 PM 1151 Views
No. I'm saying that keeping works in copyright doesn't stop them from being read, watched, etc. - 04/01/2012 10:24:50 PM 1101 Views
That's not the point, though. - 05/01/2012 01:05:17 PM 1177 Views
???? - 05/01/2012 03:22:58 PM 1137 Views
Re: ???? - 05/01/2012 04:04:21 PM 1182 Views
not to mention public libraries *NM* - 05/01/2012 03:21:04 PM 607 Views
Blame Disney. *NM* - 04/01/2012 05:48:00 PM 766 Views
I don't get it. - 04/01/2012 05:51:19 PM 1451 Views
You know those Jane Austen parodies? Only because Jane Austen is in the public domain. - 04/01/2012 09:32:20 PM 1235 Views
Parody is actually covered by the legal definition of fair use so doesn't break copyright. - 04/01/2012 10:28:08 PM 1197 Views
I'm fairly sure the Jane Austen parodies do in fact use actual paragraphs... no? *NM* - 04/01/2012 10:31:32 PM 657 Views
The zombies one doesn't precisely. It's somewhat modernised. I've not read the others. - 04/01/2012 10:32:59 PM 1132 Views
Precisely the point. - 04/01/2012 10:45:01 PM 1108 Views
Answering you specifically - 05/01/2012 04:57:33 PM 1128 Views
But that doesn't make sense. - 05/01/2012 07:18:08 PM 1328 Views
Here's the gist of it. - 06/01/2012 04:18:29 PM 1154 Views
Patents and copyrights aren't meant to last forever (shouldn't, anyway) - 04/01/2012 10:33:30 PM 1215 Views
I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 05/01/2012 05:01:05 PM 1095 Views
Copyrights stifle creativity. - 05/01/2012 07:48:08 PM 1194 Views
Re: Copyrights stifle creativity. - 06/01/2012 04:39:24 PM 1605 Views
Re: I know they aren't. I don't necessarily agree that they shouldn't though. - 06/01/2012 12:47:50 AM 1102 Views
Why. - 06/01/2012 05:05:20 PM 1770 Views
That is a very confusing article. - 04/01/2012 10:19:22 PM 1260 Views
Works published between 1923 and 1978 are different - 04/01/2012 10:25:16 PM 1191 Views
Do you think it is right that Disney can protect its movies? - 05/01/2012 05:29:08 PM 1120 Views
Ok, what has movies Disney done lately that were on par with its classics? *NM* - 05/01/2012 07:44:20 PM 501 Views
And speaking of Disney's classics... - 05/01/2012 10:06:16 PM 1264 Views
Until Disney discovered and copyrighted them, they obviouslty didn't exist. *NM* - 06/01/2012 12:58:55 AM 537 Views
Except of course they haven't copyrighted them... - 06/01/2012 01:53:01 AM 1087 Views
nice theory but you can make a Little Mermaid movie if you want - 06/01/2012 02:48:47 PM 1156 Views
Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 05/01/2012 07:57:38 PM 1290 Views
Do you really want corporations to be immortal? - 06/01/2012 12:50:11 AM 1179 Views
In a sense, aren't they already? - 06/01/2012 02:42:53 AM 1251 Views
Re: Well, if corporations are now people, then maybe their copyright could be different? *shrug* - 06/01/2012 01:18:04 AM 1180 Views
It's a thorny issue and I largely agree with you - 06/01/2012 02:50:24 AM 1199 Views
Huh... apparently, Mickey Mouse is already Public Domain anyway - 06/01/2012 07:30:36 AM 1373 Views
Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 04:17:35 AM 1300 Views
Re: Can you back that up? - 06/01/2012 06:02:01 PM 1072 Views
Re: the piracy issues - 06/01/2012 06:30:46 AM 1311 Views
Book piracy - 06/01/2012 05:21:40 PM 1386 Views
corporations have always had rights - 06/01/2012 04:08:12 PM 1140 Views

Reply to Message