Active Users:430 Time:16/06/2025 05:50:02 PM
Why's that? Aemon Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM
It sounds to me like just a typical business fight. Amazon wants to make money by selling ebooks for cheap, so that it can popularize ebooks, sell its reader hardware, etc. Macmillan wants to profit by keeping ebooks expensive, in a "status quo" type move.

Neither company seems to be doing anything particularly underhanded or slimy, as far as I can tell. If anything, Macmillan seems to be the one in the wrong. Amazon already pays them wholesale prices per-copy, so why shouldn't Amazon be able to set their own prices and lose money if they want?

Anyway, my subject line was an honest question: why is Amazon losing you as a customer over this? I realize you know a lot more about the subject than I do. I'm curious what's so bad about this move. :)
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1422 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 447 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1038 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1334 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 848 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1070 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 792 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 931 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 786 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1174 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 414 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 418 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 757 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 410 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 773 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 769 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 721 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1154 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 937 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 975 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 836 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1169 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 836 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 917 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 464 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 378 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 759 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 789 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 990 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 745 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 923 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 822 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 355 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 749 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 780 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1014 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 806 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 945 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1009 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 796 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1154 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 790 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 814 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 874 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 825 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 919 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 929 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 403 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 341 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 352 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 723 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 770 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 337 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 1823 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 917 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 737 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 872 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 727 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 718 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1001 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 342 Views

Reply to Message