Active Users:1700 Time:14/03/2026 04:42:37 PM
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. jh Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM
And that is for movies that have already made a profit and that the people have often already seen. I really don't see this as being that much different.


and I believe that most readers will look at it with the same eyes... the price of an ebook will need to be significantly lower in order to gain market shares over physical books at the moment. I am sure people will grow more friendly towards the concept of digital 'ownership' of objects but we are not there yet. The music business is going there faster, but it is easier to maintain a good quality product when you can get mp3-players for pocket money these days - most people still haven't used a reader, and that makes it more likely that they will dismiss the concept of digital purchases until they see an advantage with it - moving much or cheaper texts, whatever.

E-readers will however not be a big hit until the companies which runs them stop deleting things from them.
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1567 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 501 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1142 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1463 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 963 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1183 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 910 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 1036 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 893 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1289 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 467 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 472 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 870 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 467 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 888 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 880 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 824 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1295 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 1078 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 1095 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 956 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1284 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 955 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 1040 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 516 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 441 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 868 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 898 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 1097 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 855 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 1056 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 969 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 409 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 884 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 889 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1129 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 943 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 1056 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1110 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 911 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1273 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 917 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 935 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 981 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 945 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 1026 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 1032 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 453 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 394 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 409 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 856 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 885 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 389 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 3988 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 1028 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 889 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 983 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 833 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 827 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1102 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 394 Views

Reply to Message