E-readers will however not be a big hit until the companies which runs them stop deleting things from them.
Please. That happened one time, with one ebook manufacturer, and they've since apologized and made reparations of some sort. I forget what they did. Refunded maybe? I don't know. And yes, you can blame the apology on public fallout, that's fine (and likely accurate). All in all, though, this was a very isolated incident, and it's a bit silly to blame total ebook popularity on something so tiny, even if you aren't entirely serious. It just was not a big deal.
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices
01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM
- 1422 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM*
01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM
- 447 Views
Why's that?
01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM
- 1037 Views
I sum it up here
01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM
- 1334 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction.
01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM
- 847 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly
01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM
- 1070 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more.
01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM
- 791 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers.
01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM
- 786 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM*
01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM
- 414 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM*
01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM
- 418 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too.
01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM
- 757 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM*
01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM
- 410 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere.
01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM
- 769 Views
How easy is it to find books now?
01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM
- 720 Views
Pretty easily, actually.
01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 1154 Views
That's excellent.
01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM
- 937 Views
Screens are good.
01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM
- 975 Views

Two words: Leather cover.
01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM
- 836 Views
True, I do remember liking the cover. It's much nicer than what comes with the Sony.
01/02/2010 09:02:56 PM
- 1005 Views
This is what I have. It sounds like what you have for your Sony.
01/02/2010 09:39:02 PM
- 1038 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set.
01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM
- 1169 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM*
01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM
- 464 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience.
01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM
- 759 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20.
02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM
- 923 Views
I don't know about that.
01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM
- 822 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray
01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM
- 805 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me.
01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM
- 945 Views
I was with you till that last sentence.
01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM
- 1009 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books.
02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM
- 874 Views
Whaaa?
02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM
- 825 Views
Yes, of course.
02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM
- 919 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader.
02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM
- 929 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM*
02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM
- 403 Views
Oh, hush. Go sit in the corner and listen to your 8-track while the rest of us enjoy The Future.
*NM*
02/02/2010 02:37:33 PM
- 388 Views

The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM*
02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM
- 341 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM*
02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM
- 352 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument.
02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM
- 723 Views
It will increase the number of books available
02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM
- 1823 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools.
02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM
- 917 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right.
02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM
- 872 Views