It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM*
The Shrike Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM
They're not being open because they want their customers to be part of the process, they're being open so they can say "look, this evil publisher is trying to make you pay more for your books!" in order to get Macmillan to back down.
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices
- 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM
1565 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM*
- 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM
500 Views
Why's that?
- 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM
1140 Views
I sum it up here
- 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM
1459 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction.
- 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM
961 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly
- 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM
1180 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more.
- 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM
908 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers.
- 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM
891 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM*
- 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM
467 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM*
- 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM
471 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too.
- 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM
867 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM*
- 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM
466 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere.
- 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM
878 Views
How easy is it to find books now?
- 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM
822 Views
Pretty easily, actually.
- 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM
1292 Views
That's excellent.
- 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM
1074 Views
Screens are good.
- 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM
1093 Views
- 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM
1093 Views
Two words: Leather cover.
- 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM
954 Views
True, I do remember liking the cover. It's much nicer than what comes with the Sony.
- 01/02/2010 09:02:56 PM
1116 Views
This is what I have. It sounds like what you have for your Sony.
- 01/02/2010 09:39:02 PM
1157 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set.
- 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM
1282 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM*
- 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM
516 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience.
- 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM
867 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20.
- 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM
1054 Views
I don't know about that.
- 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM
966 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray
- 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM
939 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me.
- 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM
1054 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books.
- 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM
979 Views
Whaaa?
- 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM
943 Views
Yes, of course.
- 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM
1024 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader.
- 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM
1029 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM
453 Views
Oh, hush. Go sit in the corner and listen to your 8-track while the rest of us enjoy The Future.
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 02:37:33 PM
542 Views
*NM*
- 02/02/2010 02:37:33 PM
542 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM*
- 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM
393 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM*
- 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM
407 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument.
- 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM
852 Views
It will increase the number of books available
- 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM
3986 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools.
- 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM
1025 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right.
- 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM
979 Views

Good Lord! *NM*