Active Users:771 Time:18/12/2025 03:43:36 AM
This is what I have. It sounds like what you have for your Sony. The Shrike Send a noteboard - 01/02/2010 09:39:02 PM
If I remember right, though, it was pretty bulky, and wasn't attached to the kindle. It was just strapped in. . .or something, and not very well. I was worried that if I dropped it, the kindle would fall out on the way down. Anyway, you're right, it felt nice. It felt like reading a big, luxurious hardcover book or something. My Sony, on the other hand, has an attached cover, which is easy to hold book-style in two hands, or with the front part of the cover folded back, in one hand. It feels more like a light, comfortable paperback, which is what I'd prefer for day-to-day reading.


It's quite thin. It has hooks that secure the Kindle. Like your cover, you can hold it in two hands or folded back on itself.
link
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1525 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 489 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1106 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1424 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 921 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1147 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 866 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 997 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 861 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1247 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 451 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 458 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 827 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 449 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 849 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 843 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 785 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1256 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 1037 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 1053 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 915 Views
True, I do remember liking the cover. It's much nicer than what comes with the Sony. - 01/02/2010 09:02:56 PM 1077 Views
This is what I have. It sounds like what you have for your Sony. - 01/02/2010 09:39:02 PM 1110 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1249 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 916 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 1003 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 500 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 418 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 832 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 859 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 1058 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 817 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 1017 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 929 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 393 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 846 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 854 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1087 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 902 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 1020 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1076 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 870 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1231 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 883 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 897 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 953 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 898 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 988 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 997 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 437 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 378 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 393 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 817 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 844 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 373 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 3185 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 988 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 840 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 951 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 797 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 788 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1067 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 380 Views

Reply to Message