Active Users:2218 Time:01/05/2026 07:53:30 PM
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM
But the more people buying e-books, the less people buying real books. Obviously not a 1-to-1 relationship, but still. And even if it all ends up in the same publishing company, it doesn't end up in the pockets of the same retailers, and it effects which medium that publisher will emphasize in the future.

It's a bit of an oversimplification to think that a hit against the e-book industry is automatically a plus for traditional books, but the two are competing mediums.


Many people like myself will be quite happy to do away with paper books. I hate lugging them around, especially while traveling. In today's compact and on the go" world they are a waste of space. To seek the destruction of an emerging market because you are nostalgic toward traditional paper books is asinine.
Reply to message
Amazon Accepts Macmillan’s Demand for Higher E-Book Prices - 01/02/2010 04:21:35 PM 1647 Views
Amazon lost me as a customer over all this *NM* - 01/02/2010 05:52:53 PM 515 Views
Why's that? - 01/02/2010 06:55:35 PM 1163 Views
I sum it up here - 01/02/2010 08:42:02 PM 1484 Views
That's an interesting point. And I have an opposite reaction. - 01/02/2010 08:56:16 PM 984 Views
I like that they are public - I dislike that they affect the public so directly - 01/02/2010 08:59:41 PM 1204 Views
To each his own. I come away with the opposite reaction and like Amazon even more. - 01/02/2010 09:35:10 PM 929 Views
I agree with you. I like what Amazon did. - 02/02/2010 12:45:10 AM 1050 Views
I think his complaint is that he feels Amazon is using public opinion to pressure suppliers. - 01/02/2010 09:04:16 PM 917 Views
thats a big part of it - 01/02/2010 09:09:15 PM 1310 Views
It's a good tactic. I would have done the same thing. *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:36:31 PM 480 Views
Is it though - Amazon's stock is way down today. Seems the tactic failed *NM* - 01/02/2010 09:53:06 PM 485 Views
Apple stocks have gone down on days after major announcements too. - 01/02/2010 10:04:04 PM 895 Views
agreed - short term doesn't mean much *NM* - 01/02/2010 10:08:01 PM 479 Views
Still, your overall point stands. - 01/02/2010 11:10:25 PM 913 Views
Macmillan will lose out when people like myself choose to find the book elsewhere. - 01/02/2010 06:46:10 PM 898 Views
How easy is it to find books now? - 01/02/2010 06:53:43 PM 835 Views
Pretty easily, actually. - 01/02/2010 07:07:11 PM 1320 Views
That's excellent. - 01/02/2010 08:19:55 PM 1097 Views
Screens are good. - 01/02/2010 08:50:08 PM 1117 Views
Two words: Leather cover. - 01/02/2010 08:54:37 PM 983 Views
Unless you like a lot of old books, or have fairly eclectic tastes, you should be all set. - 01/02/2010 07:11:30 PM 1307 Views
If you do like a lot of old books - 01/02/2010 07:16:20 PM 975 Views
Yep, definitely true. I wasn't thinking quite that old, though. - 01/02/2010 07:24:49 PM 1054 Views
$12.99 to $14.99 for a fiction ebook is ridiculous. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:44:20 PM 525 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 01/02/2010 07:46:33 PM 455 Views
Then again, it's half the price of a print version, for essentially the same product / experience. - 01/02/2010 07:50:29 PM 890 Views
That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:24:08 PM 920 Views
Re: That's the thing, it's not. - 01/02/2010 08:55:35 PM 1117 Views
Because, as Aemon says, that's how price discrimination works. - 01/02/2010 11:31:14 PM 882 Views
Not really. I buy new hardcover releases at Borders for around 18 to 20. - 02/02/2010 12:34:08 AM 1083 Views
I don't know about that. - 01/02/2010 08:21:05 PM 990 Views
not really, i buy brand new paperbacks for 6.99 *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:21:16 AM 417 Views
Mass markets, yeah. - 02/02/2010 12:19:25 PM 905 Views
That is bananas. - 01/02/2010 07:46:28 PM 916 Views
"Most newly released..." - 01/02/2010 07:55:19 PM 1158 Views
People pay that sort of money for DVd and more for Blue Ray - 01/02/2010 08:00:47 PM 963 Views
Physical copy is rather important in that case, you know... at least to me. - 01/02/2010 08:54:05 PM 1071 Views
I was with you till that last sentence. - 01/02/2010 08:58:58 PM 1131 Views
I really don't think it is that different - 01/02/2010 10:01:20 PM 932 Views
If you have issues with eBook pricing, read this link - 01/02/2010 08:46:47 PM 1293 Views
He makes good points... - 01/02/2010 11:37:22 PM 944 Views
I am unimpressed by his arguments. - 02/02/2010 01:06:03 AM 963 Views
Good for MacMillan. I'll cheer on anyone who takes a stab against e-books. - 02/02/2010 04:00:05 AM 1003 Views
Whaaa? - 02/02/2010 04:08:50 AM 970 Views
Yes, of course. - 02/02/2010 04:33:13 AM 1047 Views
In ten years you'll have an ebook reader. - 02/02/2010 05:34:57 AM 1060 Views
I know. That's the problem. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:56:32 PM 463 Views
The lower prices, the increased profit, or the ecological benefit? *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:17:13 PM 402 Views
The gradual loss of physical books. *NM* - 02/02/2010 05:32:39 PM 424 Views
Mmm. I detect an illogical argument. - 02/02/2010 05:35:14 PM 880 Views
Obviously they won't disappear completely, or even that fast. - 02/02/2010 11:04:47 PM 909 Views
Why not? It'll spur the growth of used book stores. *NM* - 03/02/2010 01:29:56 AM 399 Views
It will increase the number of books available - 02/02/2010 01:55:05 PM 4208 Views
One apt analogy is the widespread use of recording tools like Pro Tools. - 02/02/2010 08:07:22 PM 1058 Views
There are already comapnies offering editng services - 02/02/2010 10:30:28 PM 907 Views
Uh, so what you want to dictate is the medium by which people read? You have no right. - 02/02/2010 08:01:09 PM 1008 Views
And again let me add that it's not necessarily one or the other. - 02/02/2010 10:09:20 PM 853 Views
That would be awesome. - 02/02/2010 11:02:42 PM 857 Views
Obviously I'm not dictating anything. I'm stating my view. - 02/02/2010 11:01:41 PM 1125 Views
Good Lord! *NM* - 02/02/2010 07:58:03 PM 409 Views

Reply to Message