Active Users:354 Time:01/07/2025 05:45:06 PM
It's more than a few right answers. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM
There are currently six known quarks: up, down, strange, charm, bottom, top. Only the first three were known before the second three were predicted by theory in the early 70s; they were all eventually confirmed by experiment, but the top quark wasn't found until 1995.

That's one example of how powerful the predictions of theory can be; there are many more. Obviously, there are a lot of incorrect theories, too. It may seem like physicists just invent new particles to solve any problems, but no matter what we hypothesize, it all comes down to what the experiments show. So far, we have found many predicted "new" particles in consistent ways (although the list of particles that have been proposed and never found is very large indeed).

The Higgs mechanism has been around since 1964, along with the prediction of at least one new particle to go along with it. It's only now that we have the technology to probe the high energy range at which such a particle could be seen.

Don't get caught up in sensationalized news reporting, which makes everything seem like a brand new invention. (To be fair, this was actually one of the better mass-consumption science articles I've read recently.) Most of the theories for which we'll soon be searching for evidence have been around in some form for decades now, being refined and probed.
Reply to message
US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles' - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM 812 Views
- 15/06/2010 04:11:11 AM 424 Views
this has always bothered me about particle physicists.... - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM 438 Views
Down with particle-of-the-gaps thinking! - 15/06/2010 05:38:20 AM 430 Views
Yeah, always been my problem, too. - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM 375 Views
Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him. - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM 398 Views
Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM 409 Views
"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!! - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM 401 Views
Oh, yes, and it's often accompanied by Dickite - 15/06/2010 06:18:35 PM 390 Views
This I can believe. - 15/06/2010 06:02:37 PM 341 Views
It's more than a few right answers. - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM 517 Views
As a physicist... - 15/06/2010 06:13:01 AM 522 Views
Cool. - 16/06/2010 01:01:34 PM 437 Views
I feel ya! *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:18:30 AM 240 Views
As a physicist, I find this quite interesting. - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM 519 Views
Not quite. - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM 501 Views
Re: Not quite. - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM 518 Views
Nerds! - 17/06/2010 12:19:57 AM 343 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 12:45:06 AM 569 Views
Re: Not quite. - 17/06/2010 08:23:10 AM 500 Views
Eight minus three is five - 17/06/2010 09:19:46 AM 348 Views

Reply to Message