They say the data point to five Higgs bosons with similar masses but different electric charges.
Three would have a neutral charge and one each would have a negative and positive electric charge. This is known as the two-Higgs doublet model.
Three would have a neutral charge and one each would have a negative and positive electric charge. This is known as the two-Higgs doublet model.
I suppose this makes a certain amount of sense. I would imagine the two charged h would couple to the Weak and EM, while the remaining three would have colour charge and couple to the Strong.
IIRC, the Tevatron is just on the boundary of being able to detect some of the possible Higgs producing interactions, so I'd treat this with a pinch of salt until things become a bit clearer in the coming years as the LHC pushes further into its range. I also get the feeling that everyone at the Tevatron is very anxious to beat the LHC to discovering the Higgs!

Either way, my lecturer works at the Tevatron, so I'm sure he's very smug right now!
 
			
		
	
		*MySmiley*_________jiggY,
~Life's a puzzle. Go figure.
_
nigelgoboom: "Whatever poopster..."
	
	
	
	
	
	
~Life's a puzzle. Go figure.
_
nigelgoboom: "Whatever poopster..."
			US experiment hints at 'multiple God particles'
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 04:04:14 AM
	        855 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
			I minored in modern physics, which means, I have enough knowledge to be.....
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 04:45:35 AM
	        441 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
			this has always bothered me about particle physicists....
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 05:32:26 AM
	        480 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
		
			Yeah, always been my problem, too.
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 05:44:30 AM
	        408 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Lederman wanted to call it "the goddamn particle," but the publisher wouldn't let him.  - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
	        434 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
	        434 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
	        434 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 06:26:56 AM
	        434 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			Well, we've been pretty bad at name stuff
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 08:52:09 AM
	        442 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			"Giant radiating dyke swarms"?!!!  - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
	        436 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
	        436 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
	        436 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 05:57:11 PM
	        436 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			It's more than a few right answers.
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 06:26:35 AM
	        561 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			did you go to school in wisconsin? cause you sound just like that guy  - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
	        421 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
	        421 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
	        421 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 07:07:49 AM
	        421 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			Yet, when determining the measure for what a planet is, Pluto vanished from the list!  - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
	        458 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
	        458 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
	        458 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 07:14:28 AM
	        458 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			right, but it's still out there in the same orbit with the same momentum and positioning  - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
	        553 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
	        553 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
	        553 Views
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 08:45:43 AM
	        553 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			It had to lose its status or you'd have to memorize several more planets
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 08:57:20 AM
	        461 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			y'all are screwing up my "uncertainty principle" joke dammit!  *NM*
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
	        184 Views
 *NM*
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
	        184 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	     *NM*
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
	        184 Views
 *NM*
	    
	         - 15/06/2010 09:19:11 AM
	        184 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I was disappointed they didn't make all the dwarf planets into planet planets.
	    
	         - 16/06/2010 01:00:51 PM
	        454 Views
	        
	    
	
	    		
			As a physicist, I find this quite interesting.
		
	         - 16/06/2010 09:08:15 PM
	        551 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Not quite.
	    
	         - 16/06/2010 09:57:18 PM
	        545 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Not quite.
	    
	         - 16/06/2010 10:22:14 PM
	        563 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 Totally missed it *NM*
 Totally missed it *NM*