Active Users:1460 Time:03/05/2026 02:27:55 AM
You'd defend this idiot? *NM* Ectheledhel Send a noteboard - 08/08/2010 06:40:34 AM
Reply to message
Let's ban all Christian Marriage. - 07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM 1783 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me. - 07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM 1162 Views
One small problem... - 07/08/2010 08:02:34 AM 1166 Views
Re tax. - 07/08/2010 08:47:22 AM 1217 Views
That seems sensible to me. - 09/08/2010 08:13:26 PM 1115 Views
Not sure what you mean by "demoted." - 07/08/2010 03:50:02 PM 1241 Views
Nice. *NM* - 07/08/2010 08:58:20 AM 667 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people. - 07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM 1425 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there! - 07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM 1241 Views
Who else should make those decisions? - 07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM 1186 Views
I'd totally... - 08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM 1095 Views
I'd totally... - 08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM 1256 Views
You'd defend this idiot? *NM* - 08/08/2010 06:40:34 AM 556 Views
Indeed - 08/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 1187 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering. - 08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM 1201 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged - 08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM 1098 Views
Um, ok. *NM* - 10/08/2010 12:48:19 AM 555 Views
*Shakes Head* - 08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM 1064 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM* - 08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM 593 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense. - 08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM 1158 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense. - 08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM 1118 Views
Gah! You did that on purpose! - 09/08/2010 01:05:13 AM 1068 Views
whoops *NM* - 09/08/2010 02:22:49 AM 515 Views
Re: *Shakes Head* - 08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM 1104 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about. - 08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM 1053 Views
You cannot be that stupid. - 11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM 1332 Views
Incorrect. Genders are not treated equally. - 11/08/2010 07:53:00 PM 1433 Views
all you need is enough support to pass an amendment - 08/08/2010 02:46:08 PM 1039 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too - 08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM 1081 Views
And what is wrong with polygamy? *NM* - 09/08/2010 10:36:53 AM 566 Views
Did I say there was anything? - 09/08/2010 11:03:10 AM 1202 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad. - 09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM 1146 Views
Is that assumption valid? - 09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM 1072 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? - 09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM 1064 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? - 09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM 1173 Views
Not really - 09/08/2010 01:20:46 PM 1034 Views
Re: Not really - 09/08/2010 01:27:04 PM 1159 Views
Re: Not really - 09/08/2010 02:14:43 PM 1027 Views
Re: Not really - 09/08/2010 03:06:31 PM 1213 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives. - 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM 1206 Views
... - 11/08/2010 03:22:50 PM 1092 Views
Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage - 09/08/2010 06:13:30 PM 1211 Views
Re: Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage - 10/08/2010 01:24:06 AM 1015 Views
Now I think about it, I'm not sure. - 10/08/2010 04:09:43 PM 1140 Views
Re: Now I think about it, I'm not sure. - 10/08/2010 06:12:39 PM 1027 Views
Great post Danny - 09/08/2010 08:22:27 PM 902 Views
It should be noted again... - 09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM 1187 Views
and how is it not a right? - 09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM 1076 Views
My definition of rights... - 09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM 1184 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right. - 10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM 946 Views
+1 - 10/08/2010 03:11:22 AM 1239 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example - 10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM 1040 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis... - 10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM 1188 Views
If we need a more specific resolution... - 10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM 1378 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though. - 10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM 1053 Views
It also doesn't say they can - 10/08/2010 04:41:18 AM 1055 Views
You're missing the point. It's not about gay marriage. - 10/08/2010 11:20:59 AM 1071 Views
No, I got that, I'm pointing out how it does so - 10/08/2010 01:47:00 PM 1070 Views
To clarify for you - 10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM 1048 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body... - 10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM 1431 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless.... - 10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM 991 Views
and the Constitution dictates nothing about marriage. *NM* - 10/08/2010 11:46:24 PM 537 Views
That means it is up to the people. And they say "No." *NM* - 11/08/2010 03:13:12 PM 546 Views
No, but it does dictate things about rights and discrimination - 12/08/2010 03:48:02 PM 1235 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right. - 10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM 1167 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction... - 10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM 1224 Views
I agree - 10/08/2010 06:11:19 PM 922 Views
Yeah but this can't be used to prove that it IS a right... - 10/08/2010 07:30:57 PM 1326 Views
Note it all you want... - 10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 921 Views
The best one yet. - 10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM 1179 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane - 10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM 1045 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane - 10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM 1147 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane - 11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM 1058 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane - 11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM 1191 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel - 11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM 1157 Views
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel - 11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM 1104 Views

Reply to Message