Active Users:185 Time:18/05/2024 07:11:01 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM
It's probably worth noting people are horribly abusing the facts with a lot of citations of 'rights' going on here, however, for the sake of argument, can anyone justify gay marriage without justifying polygamy or incest and without mentioning procreation or two?


This is a tangent, but what are forums for if not tangents.

There is nothing inherently evil in polygamy, or indeed polyandry. As long as it is an open and honest arrangement, I don't see a problem with it. In fact, it is much more acceptable to me than people cheating on their spouses.

Incest is a whole other ball game.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Let's ban all Christian Marriage. Dannymac - 07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM 1491 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me. Helene - 07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM 918 Views
One small problem... Phelix - 07/08/2010 08:02:34 AM 935 Views
Re tax. Rebekah - 07/08/2010 08:47:22 AM 967 Views
That seems sensible to me. SilverWarder - 09/08/2010 08:13:26 PM 814 Views
Not sure what you mean by "demoted." Dannymac - 07/08/2010 03:50:02 PM 970 Views
Nice. *NM* Camilla - 07/08/2010 08:58:20 AM 562 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people. Cannoli - 07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM 1134 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there! Dannymac - 07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM 951 Views
Who else should make those decisions? Cannoli - 07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM 894 Views
I'd totally... Ectheledhel - 08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM 867 Views
I'd totally... ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM 1011 Views
You'd defend this idiot? *NM* Ectheledhel - 08/08/2010 06:40:34 AM 448 Views
Indeed ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 946 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering. everynametaken - 08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM 937 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged Cannoli - 08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM 848 Views
Um, ok. *NM* everynametaken - 10/08/2010 12:48:19 AM 450 Views
*Shakes Head* Dannymac - 08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM 819 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM* ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM 479 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense. Great Lord of Chaos - 08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM 910 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense. ßelals Girl - 08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM 873 Views
Gah! You did that on purpose! Vodalus - 09/08/2010 01:05:13 AM 824 Views
whoops *NM* ßelals Girl - 09/08/2010 02:22:49 AM 412 Views
Re: *Shakes Head* Cannoli - 08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM 863 Views
I still do not see how you think marriage is a "pointless" institution LadyLorraine - 08/08/2010 08:05:45 PM 963 Views
No, I was referring to same-sex marriage. Real marriage hardly counts as a novelty. *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 02:28:43 PM 392 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about. Dannymac - 08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM 807 Views
You cannot be that stupid. Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM 1093 Views
There's a lot of ridiculous arguments here, but I'll focus on just one of them... Legolas - 11/08/2010 03:38:05 PM 975 Views
Incorrect. Genders are not treated equally. Dreaded Anomaly - 11/08/2010 07:53:00 PM 1183 Views
all you need is enough support to pass an amendment random thoughts - 08/08/2010 02:46:08 PM 808 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM 834 Views
And what is wrong with polygamy? *NM* Ectheledhel - 09/08/2010 10:36:53 AM 447 Views
Did I say there was anything? Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:03:10 AM 956 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad. Camilla - 09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM 879 Views
Is that assumption valid? Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM 827 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? Camilla - 09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM 806 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? Isaac - 09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM 925 Views
Not really snoopcester - 09/08/2010 01:20:46 PM 783 Views
Re: Not really Isaac - 09/08/2010 01:27:04 PM 906 Views
Re: Not really snoopcester - 09/08/2010 02:14:43 PM 793 Views
Re: Not really Isaac - 09/08/2010 03:06:31 PM 940 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives. Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM 956 Views
... Camilla - 11/08/2010 03:22:50 PM 835 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too snoopcester - 09/08/2010 11:25:39 AM 839 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 09/08/2010 11:51:50 AM 802 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too snoopcester - 09/08/2010 01:18:35 PM 890 Views
Re: A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too Isaac - 09/08/2010 02:54:19 PM 910 Views
Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage LadyLorraine - 09/08/2010 06:13:30 PM 962 Views
Re: Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage Isaac - 10/08/2010 01:24:06 AM 784 Views
Now I think about it, I'm not sure. Dannymac - 10/08/2010 04:09:43 PM 892 Views
Re: Now I think about it, I'm not sure. Isaac - 10/08/2010 06:12:39 PM 780 Views
Great post Danny SilverWarder - 09/08/2010 08:22:27 PM 644 Views
It should be noted again... Jeordam - 09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM 934 Views
and how is it not a right? LadyLorraine - 09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM 810 Views
My definition of rights... Jeordam - 09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM 937 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right. LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM 712 Views
+1 Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 03:11:22 AM 988 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example Isaac - 10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM 808 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM 923 Views
If we need a more specific resolution... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM 1096 Views
No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Isaac - 10/08/2010 05:25:57 AM 804 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 03:04:39 PM 1101 Views
That's really a ridiculous stance, you do realize. Legolas - 10/08/2010 03:23:02 PM 772 Views
The point is that marriage IS a right, one which cannot be denied based upon sexual orientation *NM* Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:04:16 PM 643 Views
Re: No, the choice of 'Men and Women' is too specific in the context Isaac - 10/08/2010 03:46:56 PM 991 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though. Dreaded Anomaly - 10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM 803 Views
It also doesn't say they can Isaac - 10/08/2010 04:41:18 AM 810 Views
You're missing the point. It's not about gay marriage. Legolas - 10/08/2010 11:20:59 AM 789 Views
No, I got that, I'm pointing out how it does so Isaac - 10/08/2010 01:47:00 PM 821 Views
I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point. LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 06:09:32 PM 799 Views
Re: I know, and that's been brought up before. But that's not my point. Isaac - 10/08/2010 06:33:56 PM 729 Views
It's mentioned as a right in some SC decision quoted in that Walker opinion. *NM* Legolas - 10/08/2010 06:51:13 PM 404 Views
To clarify for you SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM 734 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM 1171 Views
I'm not sure that I would call the Security Council the 'Enforcement Body' SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 08:43:02 PM 782 Views
The fact that it is capable of authorizing the use of military force makes it an enforcement body Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 10:33:59 PM 1037 Views
Disagree - but it's most a matter of definition there SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 04:31:53 PM 942 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless.... Jeordam - 10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM 745 Views
and the Constitution dictates nothing about marriage. *NM* LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 11:46:24 PM 432 Views
That means it is up to the people. And they say "No." *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:13:12 PM 437 Views
No, but it does dictate things about rights and discrimination SilverWarder - 12/08/2010 03:48:02 PM 985 Views
Why don't YOU back up your assertion that the right to marry exists? *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:16:02 PM 450 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right. Dreaded Anomaly - 10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM 882 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction... Vodalus - 10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM 959 Views
I agree LadyLorraine - 10/08/2010 06:11:19 PM 691 Views
Yeah but this can't be used to prove that it IS a right... Napoleon62 - 10/08/2010 07:30:57 PM 1027 Views
Note it all you want... Dannymac - 10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 677 Views
No, they seek to expand the terms of the partnership. Homosexuals can & do get married normally *NM* Cannoli - 11/08/2010 03:14:25 PM 453 Views
The best one yet. Camilla - 10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM 924 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane SilverWarder - 10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM 803 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane Camilla - 10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM 908 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM 788 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane Camilla - 11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM 910 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel SilverWarder - 11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM 888 Views
Re: Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel Camilla - 11/08/2010 05:09:23 PM 877 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes