Active Users:165 Time:18/05/2024 10:59:53 PM
Indeed ßelals Girl Send a noteboard - 08/08/2010 06:43:53 AM
I haven't exactly made it a secret that he's one of my favorite posters here ;)

Anyway, lunchbreak is over, so I gotta go back to work. Don't throw rocks at me on the way out! :P
Reply to message
Let's ban all Christian Marriage. - 07/08/2010 06:36:13 AM 1491 Views
Nice satire, but it raises another point for me. - 07/08/2010 07:20:49 AM 919 Views
One small problem... - 07/08/2010 08:02:34 AM 935 Views
Re tax. - 07/08/2010 08:47:22 AM 967 Views
That seems sensible to me. - 09/08/2010 08:13:26 PM 814 Views
Not sure what you mean by "demoted." - 07/08/2010 03:50:02 PM 971 Views
Nice. *NM* - 07/08/2010 08:58:20 AM 562 Views
That would only be appropriate if Christians wanted to ban secular unions of normal people. - 07/08/2010 11:51:29 AM 1135 Views
Hey, look! There was a point over there! - 07/08/2010 03:46:41 PM 952 Views
Who else should make those decisions? - 07/08/2010 08:00:39 PM 895 Views
I'd totally... - 08/08/2010 04:14:15 AM 868 Views
I'd totally... - 08/08/2010 06:17:30 AM 1012 Views
You'd defend this idiot? *NM* - 08/08/2010 06:40:34 AM 449 Views
Indeed - 08/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 947 Views
I used to think Joel was the biggest rambler on this site. I am seriously reconsidering. - 08/08/2010 05:24:56 AM 938 Views
And my assessment of one poster as the most content-poor, non-contributing slug is unchanged - 08/08/2010 07:17:02 PM 849 Views
Um, ok. *NM* - 10/08/2010 12:48:19 AM 451 Views
*Shakes Head* - 08/08/2010 06:23:47 AM 819 Views
I highly doubt Cannoli is "scared" of homosexuals *NM* - 08/08/2010 06:29:54 AM 480 Views
Perhaps not in the physical sense. - 08/08/2010 06:35:53 AM 911 Views
Re: Perhaps not in the physical sense. - 08/08/2010 06:46:56 AM 874 Views
Gah! You did that on purpose! - 09/08/2010 01:05:13 AM 825 Views
whoops *NM* - 09/08/2010 02:22:49 AM 412 Views
Re: *Shakes Head* - 08/08/2010 07:43:11 PM 865 Views
This must be the "thought out reaction" I've heard so much about. - 08/08/2010 10:45:59 PM 807 Views
You cannot be that stupid. - 11/08/2010 03:10:55 PM 1093 Views
Incorrect. Genders are not treated equally. - 11/08/2010 07:53:00 PM 1184 Views
all you need is enough support to pass an amendment - 08/08/2010 02:46:08 PM 810 Views
A lot of the arguments would seem to justify polygamy and incest too - 08/08/2010 11:51:24 PM 836 Views
And what is wrong with polygamy? *NM* - 09/08/2010 10:36:53 AM 448 Views
Did I say there was anything? - 09/08/2010 11:03:10 AM 957 Views
Plolygamy and incest are not on the same level of bad. - 09/08/2010 11:00:07 AM 880 Views
Is that assumption valid? - 09/08/2010 11:36:26 AM 828 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? - 09/08/2010 11:46:42 AM 808 Views
Re: Is that assumption valid? - 09/08/2010 12:07:22 PM 927 Views
Not really - 09/08/2010 01:20:46 PM 785 Views
Re: Not really - 09/08/2010 01:27:04 PM 908 Views
Re: Not really - 09/08/2010 02:14:43 PM 794 Views
Re: Not really - 09/08/2010 03:06:31 PM 942 Views
Spoken like someone who does not have to insure an employee's six wives. - 11/08/2010 03:11:57 PM 956 Views
... - 11/08/2010 03:22:50 PM 836 Views
Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage - 09/08/2010 06:13:30 PM 963 Views
Re: Mmm, but when you're strictly discussing marriage - 10/08/2010 01:24:06 AM 784 Views
Now I think about it, I'm not sure. - 10/08/2010 04:09:43 PM 893 Views
Re: Now I think about it, I'm not sure. - 10/08/2010 06:12:39 PM 781 Views
Great post Danny - 09/08/2010 08:22:27 PM 644 Views
It should be noted again... - 09/08/2010 08:59:32 PM 935 Views
and how is it not a right? - 09/08/2010 09:19:12 PM 812 Views
My definition of rights... - 09/08/2010 10:47:16 PM 937 Views
mmm, but the UN has legally stated marriage as a right. - 10/08/2010 02:52:03 AM 712 Views
+1 - 10/08/2010 03:11:22 AM 988 Views
Article 16 probably not a great example - 10/08/2010 03:44:04 AM 809 Views
You could just as easily move the emphasis... - 10/08/2010 04:08:46 AM 923 Views
If we need a more specific resolution... - 10/08/2010 04:22:12 AM 1096 Views
It doesn't say a man can only marry a woman or vice versa, though. - 10/08/2010 04:24:17 AM 804 Views
It also doesn't say they can - 10/08/2010 04:41:18 AM 811 Views
You're missing the point. It's not about gay marriage. - 10/08/2010 11:20:59 AM 789 Views
No, I got that, I'm pointing out how it does so - 10/08/2010 01:47:00 PM 822 Views
To clarify for you - 10/08/2010 05:36:14 AM 735 Views
The UNSC is actually the UN's enforcement body... - 10/08/2010 07:16:31 PM 1172 Views
What the UN thinks is *completely* worthless.... - 10/08/2010 06:43:15 PM 746 Views
and the Constitution dictates nothing about marriage. *NM* - 10/08/2010 11:46:24 PM 433 Views
That means it is up to the people. And they say "No." *NM* - 11/08/2010 03:13:12 PM 438 Views
No, but it does dictate things about rights and discrimination - 12/08/2010 03:48:02 PM 985 Views
The actual ruling on Prop 8 specifices marriage as a freedom, not a right. - 10/08/2010 12:02:17 AM 883 Views
Out of curiosity, what would you say to using the Ninth Amendment, possibly in conjunction... - 10/08/2010 12:20:19 AM 959 Views
I agree - 10/08/2010 06:11:19 PM 692 Views
Yeah but this can't be used to prove that it IS a right... - 10/08/2010 07:30:57 PM 1027 Views
Note it all you want... - 10/08/2010 06:43:53 AM 678 Views
The best one yet. - 10/08/2010 07:59:17 PM 925 Views
Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane - 10/08/2010 08:49:24 PM 803 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane - 10/08/2010 09:03:11 PM 909 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane - 11/08/2010 04:35:03 PM 789 Views
Re: Yeah, I'd agree that's pretty insane - 11/08/2010 04:41:23 PM 911 Views
Hmm - been a long time since I read my copy of the graphic novel - 11/08/2010 05:06:47 PM 888 Views

Reply to Message