Active Users:576 Time:02/06/2026 08:29:45 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
What a mature response. MalkierKnight Send a noteboard - 12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM
Banging of head against wall is now boring.

There's really no point in me replying to you because it's all been said before.

You're wrong about the Bible's stance on sex, your point that churches sanction sin all the time is bizarre, and, as you refuse to consider anything anyone says to you in response I am really not going to waste any more of my time. I'll let the others continue their fun.

Have you ever considered, though, that maybe, just maybe, you've got everything mixed up here?


Yes, I have considered it a lot, actually.

You are the one who refuses to accept that churches might wrongfully discriminate at all.

The real question here is not what churches ought to believe (frankly, I don't care) but what they ought to be allowed to do. I believe that banning gay marriage is discrimination. I believe this because sins are accepted in other parts of christianity and even embraced as something to be dealt with before god.

Some, not all, churches do pass out condoms to young people, in the hopes that they will avoid pregnancy out of wedlock. Is this not a form of sanctioning premarital sex? At least, in the same sense that gay marriage would be?

Some, not all, churches allow divorce. Does this not diminish wedding vows? Which are to be eternal before god. Is this not a form of sanctioning a sin?

If I'm grossly ignoring your points and refusing to listen, please enlighten me. But I would appreciate if you show me how my points are not valid.
You must unlearn what you have learned.
Reply to message
Gay Marriage MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:23:19 AM 2094 Views
I disagree on the latter part snoopcester - 12/08/2010 12:04:15 PM 1426 Views
I follow your point... MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 12:14:17 PM 1412 Views
Suspect you would find plenty of denominations that would argue with you rather strenuously. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 12:24:55 PM 1450 Views
See, that's what I'm saying... MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:37:26 PM 1375 Views
She didn't say that gays ought not be married. Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 07:45:37 PM 1250 Views
You didn't read my post. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:10:21 PM 1309 Views
Actually, you didn't read my post MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 09:23:54 PM 1391 Views
Um, you're wrong. Phelix - 12/08/2010 09:37:13 PM 1334 Views
Re: Um, you're wrong. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 09:44:17 PM 1294 Views
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale. And no, he described it accurately. *NM* Legolas - 12/08/2010 09:53:31 PM 661 Views
You're still wrong. Phelix - 12/08/2010 09:54:55 PM 1431 Views
Re: You're still wrong. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 09:58:26 PM 1285 Views
Again, you are still wrong. Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:04:42 PM 1356 Views
Re: Again, you are still wrong. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:17:13 PM 1178 Views
Wrong definition of "club" Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:30:52 PM 1449 Views
My clubs are cooler than yours. *NM* Rebekah - 12/08/2010 10:35:13 PM 694 Views
I play golf with mine. *NM* Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:43:01 PM 712 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club" MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:40:55 PM 1346 Views
Are you a member of one of those churches? Rebekah - 12/08/2010 10:44:12 PM 1338 Views
Also also: Rebekah - 12/08/2010 10:46:05 PM 1329 Views
Re: Are you a member of one of those churches? MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:49:44 PM 1326 Views
Re: Wrong definition of "club" Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:47:20 PM 1365 Views
I don't think he means that kind of club. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 10:31:41 PM 1248 Views
Also MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:02:44 PM 1407 Views
And wrong again. Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:08:24 PM 1417 Views
Not so quick! MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:21:31 PM 1245 Views
Yes, so quick! Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:32:13 PM 1199 Views
Let's be reasonable here MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:41:53 PM 1300 Views
Why do you get to judge? Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:48:57 PM 1337 Views
I don't MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:53:21 PM 1225 Views
OK. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 10:58:22 PM 1335 Views
Re: OK. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 11:03:50 PM 1301 Views
Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 11:14:03 PM 1239 Views
Re: Here's the thing: your opinion seems to be informed by the Roman Catholic Faith. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 11:23:35 PM 1354 Views
Then please stop. Phelix - 12/08/2010 11:01:05 PM 1304 Views
What's wrong with discussion? MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 11:05:48 PM 1259 Views
Discussion? Nothing. Your assertions about other people's views, something. Phelix - 12/08/2010 11:09:48 PM 1269 Views
Really? MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 11:13:46 PM 1302 Views
Yes. That is incorrect. Phelix - 12/08/2010 11:18:05 PM 1267 Views
What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay? Legolas - 12/08/2010 10:12:54 PM 1162 Views
Re: What, because the expressive message of scouting is anti-gay? MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:23:36 PM 1281 Views
Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer. Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 10:36:48 PM 1264 Views
Re: Well then that brings us back to my question, which you have yet to answer. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:46:22 PM 1365 Views
Apparently you do believe that you are more qualified Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 10:57:00 PM 1228 Views
You are wrong MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 11:11:37 PM 1089 Views
Really? Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 11:19:10 PM 1157 Views
Not entirely true either... or, well, true as far as Brown goes. Legolas - 12/08/2010 10:08:42 PM 1253 Views
Heh... we discuss restaurants a post or two over there.. ---> Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:10:26 PM 1337 Views
Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:38:33 PM 1349 Views
Re: Actually, I did. And since everyone else told you you're wrong about that I didn't see any need MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 09:55:05 PM 1247 Views
Gah. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:59:45 PM 1201 Views
Yes yes yes. It was ungracious. I got bored. *NM* Rebekah - 12/08/2010 10:03:17 PM 636 Views
What a mature response. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:11:00 PM 1417 Views
Yes. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 10:21:38 PM 1359 Views
Re: Yes. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:35:51 PM 1309 Views
I can't speak for Rebekah, but I don't think the issue is that your points are invalid per se. Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 10:22:30 PM 1218 Views
I think my point was unclear in that post MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:55:34 PM 1292 Views
It seems that by your (to me nebulous) definition Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 11:05:01 PM 1324 Views
Re: I think my point was unclear in that post Camilla - 13/08/2010 10:58:28 AM 1220 Views
+1 Camilla - 13/08/2010 09:16:24 AM 1096 Views
Hehe Camilla - 13/08/2010 10:46:25 AM 1145 Views
Um Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 09:46:43 PM 1361 Views
That's a very good question. *NM* Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:49:05 PM 640 Views
So good it doesn't even need an answer, apparently *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 10:26:41 PM 691 Views
So good I responded to it someplace else. *NM* MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:56:05 PM 570 Views
It makes no sense Camilla - 12/08/2010 04:29:24 PM 1207 Views
Re: It makes no sense MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:39:25 PM 1271 Views
Re: It makes no sense Camilla - 12/08/2010 07:41:02 PM 1370 Views
It's not sanctioning anything MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 09:25:44 PM 1304 Views
Re: It's not sanctioning anything Camilla - 12/08/2010 09:28:45 PM 1291 Views
Nonsense snoopcester - 12/08/2010 09:35:25 PM 1217 Views
Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder... Kronin al'Sulc - 12/08/2010 09:08:53 PM 1190 Views
Re: Yes, but while marrying two murderers does not ensure that they will continue to murder... MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 09:42:21 PM 1303 Views
Suspect you've not read that either. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:43:32 PM 1233 Views
What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin? Phelix - 12/08/2010 09:45:33 PM 1360 Views
Infant baptism, obviously. Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 09:51:48 PM 1344 Views
*NM* Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:53:17 PM 468 Views
*groan* I forgot that one! Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:09:07 PM 1325 Views
Re: What other church sanctioned circumstances encourage continued sin? Camilla - 13/08/2010 11:04:02 AM 1331 Views
Wow, it's almost like an entire denomination believes that! *NM* Ghavrel - 13/08/2010 03:41:07 PM 633 Views
really? Camilla - 13/08/2010 03:42:42 PM 1173 Views
Camilla - 13/08/2010 03:43:26 PM 1109 Views
Yeah, that's the Roman Catholic basis against masturbation and contraception. *NM* Ghavrel - 13/08/2010 04:12:00 PM 602 Views
Yes Camilla - 13/08/2010 04:22:58 PM 1142 Views
Which is interesting Sareitha Sedai - 13/08/2010 04:28:09 PM 1122 Views
Yes Camilla - 13/08/2010 04:29:25 PM 1110 Views
Original poster. *NM* Rebekah - 13/08/2010 04:32:18 PM 665 Views
Camilla - 13/08/2010 04:34:30 PM 1167 Views
Dude....please at least have a working knowledge of the Bible before you spout off. Jeordam - 12/08/2010 10:47:13 PM 1171 Views
I like the part in 1 Corinthians (is it chapter 6?) Rebekah - 12/08/2010 10:49:55 PM 1075 Views
Ya know?!? Jeordam - 12/08/2010 10:55:27 PM 1193 Views
I'm not sure you're correct there. Tom - 12/08/2010 04:33:02 PM 1284 Views
Re: I'm not sure you're correct there. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:40:16 PM 1303 Views
There is a difference... Dannymac - 12/08/2010 09:02:20 PM 1340 Views
No you don't. snoopcester - 12/08/2010 09:16:52 PM 1319 Views
That's another concern Isaac - 12/08/2010 12:39:53 PM 1376 Views
Not quite my point snoopcester - 12/08/2010 09:19:50 PM 1251 Views
secular marriage is decoupled from religious marriage random thoughts - 12/08/2010 02:50:43 PM 1394 Views
Simple, require the legal and religious marriage to be performed separately. Legolas - 12/08/2010 02:58:43 PM 1208 Views
And they are, in fact, separate right now in the US. They're just called the same thing. Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 03:29:26 PM 1264 Views
It's not the same name that's confusing so much as the single ceremony. Or so it seems to me. Legolas - 12/08/2010 03:37:20 PM 1253 Views
I disagree. I think giving the legal institution the same name as the sacrament is the problem. Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 03:59:43 PM 1249 Views
What in the world would that accomplish? random thoughts - 12/08/2010 03:44:32 PM 1303 Views
Provide some much-needed clarity, evidently. Legolas - 12/08/2010 03:49:33 PM 1132 Views
the problem is it would be changing a centuries old tradition.. random thoughts - 12/08/2010 04:26:47 PM 1161 Views
heheheheheheheHAHAHAHEHEHehehehehahheeh*cough* Camilla - 12/08/2010 04:55:09 PM 1195 Views
thats OK I am sure you will get over it random thoughts - 12/08/2010 05:22:08 PM 1203 Views
Just guessing, but I think it was the "centuries old tradition" that set off the giggle fit. Phelix - 12/08/2010 07:25:38 PM 1304 Views
Really? I was hoping for something better random thoughts - 12/08/2010 10:06:00 PM 1256 Views
So government recognition makes your religion meaningful? Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:11:54 PM 1360 Views
not my religion I'm agnostic random thoughts - 12/08/2010 10:34:40 PM 1190 Views
OK, but the point remains the same. Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:51:59 PM 1308 Views
Of course it would random thoughts - 12/08/2010 11:10:03 PM 1389 Views
I'm not far left, thank you very much. *NM* Legolas - 12/08/2010 10:20:31 PM 699 Views
no but your are European and that slants your views *NM* random thoughts - 12/08/2010 10:36:01 PM 680 Views
Sure, but in this case it has little to do with left or right. Legolas - 12/08/2010 10:40:42 PM 1258 Views
that is what I said when I metioned you were European *NM* random thoughts - 12/08/2010 11:11:31 PM 673 Views
Simples snoopcester - 12/08/2010 09:30:31 PM 1275 Views
there are about 140 post ranging from boyscouts to infant babtism random thoughts - 12/08/2010 10:57:46 PM 1247 Views
So. snoopcester - 14/08/2010 01:27:59 AM 1123 Views
sorry I responded I forgot what a tool you are. my bad random thoughts - 14/08/2010 02:48:57 AM 1632 Views
You spout some utter gibberish then dish out insults when called on it? Very funny snoopcester - 15/08/2010 12:47:04 PM 1465 Views
Agreed *NM* Camilla - 12/08/2010 03:45:04 PM 553 Views
I love you, Camilla lyringlas - 12/08/2010 04:02:15 PM 1072 Views
Re: I love you, Camilla Camilla - 12/08/2010 04:04:10 PM 1272 Views
Is there an all above option? *NM* lyringlas - 12/08/2010 04:23:24 PM 705 Views
Naturally. Camilla - 12/08/2010 04:25:14 PM 1261 Views
I know I do *NM* LadyLorraine - 12/08/2010 05:17:35 PM 647 Views
Another thing MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:42:21 PM 1364 Views
A couple of things SilverWarder - 12/08/2010 12:58:09 PM 1264 Views
I disagree MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:47:26 PM 1395 Views
Well, you're within your rights to certainly SilverWarder - 12/08/2010 08:24:30 PM 1338 Views
there is major flaw in your argument random thoughts - 12/08/2010 03:31:45 PM 1391 Views
Re: there is major flaw in your argument lyringlas - 12/08/2010 04:01:32 PM 1277 Views
I should clarify that I support gay marriage random thoughts - 12/08/2010 05:20:36 PM 1217 Views
One point about Prop. 8 Phelix - 12/08/2010 07:38:55 PM 1238 Views
I know that is the commonl;y held belief but I thinkit is wrong random thoughts - 12/08/2010 10:32:58 PM 1169 Views
Religious institutions, though, pushed hard to pass it. Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:42:33 PM 1258 Views
that doesn’t translate into people voting for religious reasons random thoughts - 12/08/2010 11:19:48 PM 1068 Views
Bigotry and Fear that are supported and encouraged by religious institutions. Phelix - 12/08/2010 11:32:30 PM 1239 Views
there are major flaws in your argument MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:51:52 PM 1385 Views
Women can't be priests in the Catholic church. Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 08:00:24 PM 1022 Views
Hehe. You beat me by 6 seconds. *NM* Camilla - 12/08/2010 08:03:28 PM 594 Views
Great minds and all. *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 12/08/2010 08:06:01 PM 598 Views
I was writing a reply to this post... lyringlas - 12/08/2010 03:51:01 PM 1285 Views
I feel your pain *NM* MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:52:28 PM 679 Views
Forcing religious institutions to marry gay couples is hideously unconstitutional. Tom - 12/08/2010 04:18:59 PM 1344 Views
100% agreed. LadyLorraine - 12/08/2010 05:05:35 PM 1385 Views
This. *NM* Ghavrel - 12/08/2010 07:36:57 PM 513 Views
You are absolutely wrong MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:57:19 PM 1310 Views
By that token Camilla - 12/08/2010 08:00:30 PM 1179 Views
My God.... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:49:18 PM 1258 Views
no You are absolutely wrong random thoughts - 12/08/2010 10:08:57 PM 1184 Views
Well, that was horrifyingly stupid. Ghavrel - 13/08/2010 12:57:46 AM 1302 Views
Your arguments are so specious and stupid I don't know where to begin. Tom - 13/08/2010 05:04:17 AM 1203 Views
I am a Christian who wholeheartedly supports Gay Marriage. Seriana Sedai - 12/08/2010 06:49:28 PM 1378 Views
Fair enough. MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 08:01:37 PM 1311 Views
Why do people equate.... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 07:11:15 PM 1245 Views
Because "homophobic", like "xenophobic", has shifted a bit in meaning... Legolas - 12/08/2010 07:33:56 PM 1273 Views
So then.... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 07:39:24 PM 1233 Views
Well, strongly anti-gay, yes. Legolas - 12/08/2010 07:43:40 PM 1067 Views
Homophobic is generally "anti-gay" or "anti-queer"... Phelix - 12/08/2010 07:46:22 PM 1369 Views
Because your reasons for being against gay marriage are so specious *NM* MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 07:59:42 PM 697 Views
I particularly enjoy the implied assumption that your a good enough judge of my motivations. *NM* Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:24:14 PM 653 Views
Re: Why do people equate.... Sidious - 12/08/2010 08:04:24 PM 1455 Views
+1 Camilla - 12/08/2010 08:06:19 PM 1397 Views
Stop with the pile on Camilla. Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:22:35 PM 1325 Views
You would have said nothing if I had just said "agreed" Camilla - 12/08/2010 09:27:33 PM 1150 Views
Which speaks highly of you.... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:36:30 PM 1319 Views
This is being very petty. *NM* Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:41:26 PM 641 Views
As opposed to a snarky +1 comment? *NM* Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:45:02 PM 668 Views
It's not snarky. Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:47:47 PM 1314 Views
Its a +1 shorthand comment... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:52:04 PM 1553 Views
Wow. Those two characters allowed you to read Camilla's motivations? Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:54:25 PM 1196 Views
*shrug* Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:58:42 PM 1380 Views
Yes, I am terribly selfish Camilla - 13/08/2010 09:10:54 AM 1175 Views
Re: Why do people equate.... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:13:07 PM 1388 Views
Re: Why do people equate.... Camilla - 12/08/2010 09:26:41 PM 1279 Views
LOL Rebekah - 12/08/2010 09:42:32 PM 1245 Views
Re: LOL Camilla - 13/08/2010 09:12:29 AM 1194 Views
you are exactly why the state needs to make a clear seperation between the secular and religious snoopcester - 12/08/2010 09:33:22 PM 1245 Views
Ok, so if the state does then... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 09:44:31 PM 1167 Views
No, marriage started because of property. Phelix - 12/08/2010 09:59:14 PM 1273 Views
So then two things come to mind... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 10:04:39 PM 1249 Views
Only two? Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:27:08 PM 1244 Views
Is this the same guy... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 10:43:02 PM 1147 Views
I thought the cow died in an accident, but yes... that guy. Phelix - 12/08/2010 10:58:46 PM 1216 Views
That's a little difficult to do SilverWarder - 13/08/2010 03:19:32 PM 1460 Views
Re: That's a little difficult to do Camilla - 13/08/2010 03:30:14 PM 1296 Views
Oh, I hope not SilverWarder - 13/08/2010 04:19:47 PM 1280 Views
I may be wrong Camilla - 13/08/2010 04:24:28 PM 1268 Views
Property isn't just agricultural. Phelix - 13/08/2010 06:11:12 PM 1197 Views
True enough SilverWarder - 16/08/2010 03:12:31 PM 1465 Views
yes but about half of the old testament deals with protecting those rights random thoughts - 13/08/2010 05:16:09 PM 1246 Views
The relationship between religion and rain go even farther back... Phelix - 13/08/2010 06:15:32 PM 1244 Views
to me it is a beside the point when it comes to the law random thoughts - 13/08/2010 06:25:50 PM 1224 Views
moot, not mute Camilla - 13/08/2010 08:48:04 PM 1526 Views
damn random thoughts - 13/08/2010 08:52:23 PM 1328 Views
Actually, I agree with that snoopcester - 12/08/2010 10:01:37 PM 1141 Views
See, now this, I could deal with.... Jeordam - 12/08/2010 10:06:15 PM 1139 Views
So is it that you are hung up on the name then? SilverWarder - 13/08/2010 03:29:02 PM 1201 Views
Rights.... Phelix - 12/08/2010 09:34:45 PM 1234 Views
See, what I don't get is why gay people care about jh - 12/08/2010 08:18:45 PM 1238 Views
It's mostly about getting married in the eyes of the state. Phelix - 12/08/2010 08:42:52 PM 1350 Views
I'm fairly sure Jonte was referring only to the "churches have to accept gay marriages" bit. *NM* Legolas - 12/08/2010 08:44:52 PM 693 Views
Hmmm... Then I shall reply to that part here. Phelix - 12/08/2010 08:50:10 PM 1371 Views
Oh, so it is an american thing, then. *NM* jh - 14/08/2010 08:58:28 AM 636 Views
Starting again Camilla - 12/08/2010 08:23:08 PM 1364 Views
Not at all MalkierKnight - 12/08/2010 10:58:45 PM 1276 Views
Re: Not at all Camilla - 13/08/2010 09:14:48 AM 1059 Views
Agreed *NM* snoopcester - 13/08/2010 10:21:06 AM 539 Views
Oh dear Camilla - 13/08/2010 10:30:45 AM 1161 Views
But what if I like being selfish and evil? *NM* snoopcester - 13/08/2010 11:25:01 AM 681 Views
Well, being English might help you get away with it Camilla - 13/08/2010 11:26:17 AM 1099 Views
I'm curious Sareitha Sedai - 13/08/2010 01:49:15 PM 1225 Views
Camilla - 13/08/2010 01:54:19 PM 1114 Views
Okay, good. Sareitha Sedai - 13/08/2010 01:58:14 PM 1275 Views
I suppose you also think that religious Pacifists should be eligible for the draft? Dannymac - 12/08/2010 08:42:21 PM 1321 Views
very nicely said *NM* random thoughts - 13/08/2010 02:16:53 PM 546 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes