When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM*
		Francie Send a noteboard - 16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM
		
	I'm starting to think it's about time for the US to "annex" Mexico. I live in South Texas and I was recently talking to one of my Hispanic friends about the illegal immigration/drug problem with our neighbors to the south. We had an intelligent debate about the issue and we both agreed that nobody is paying attention the real problem with illegal immigration: Mexico.
Mexico is such a God-awful country that people are fleeing in droves (no offense to anybody from Mexico or who has family there. I have many, many Hispanic friends who agree that Mexico is a dangerous place. It sucks because some areas are really beautiful). So I told my friend, tongue-in-cheek, that we should just take Mexico over. We laughed about it and discussed other things.
However, the thought has stuck with me ever since. I started thinking about the history of this world and how countries have come into being. So my philosophical question for the day is, once a country is established, does it have the right to always exist as is? At what point does a country deserve to have better leadership?
By the way, I don't think we should really take over Mexico. It's just frustration with the immigration debate and the drug violence. A lot of people here in South Texas are affected by it. I just wish Mexico could get its act together. I wonder, though, how the Mexican people would feel about being a part of the US. Do a majority of them have national pride? Hmmm food for thought
			
		
	Mexico is such a God-awful country that people are fleeing in droves (no offense to anybody from Mexico or who has family there. I have many, many Hispanic friends who agree that Mexico is a dangerous place. It sucks because some areas are really beautiful). So I told my friend, tongue-in-cheek, that we should just take Mexico over. We laughed about it and discussed other things.
However, the thought has stuck with me ever since. I started thinking about the history of this world and how countries have come into being. So my philosophical question for the day is, once a country is established, does it have the right to always exist as is? At what point does a country deserve to have better leadership?
By the way, I don't think we should really take over Mexico. It's just frustration with the immigration debate and the drug violence. A lot of people here in South Texas are affected by it. I just wish Mexico could get its act together. I wonder, though, how the Mexican people would feel about being a part of the US. Do a majority of them have national pride? Hmmm food for thought
		Francie
The New Black
	
	
	
	
	
The New Black
			At what point does it become ok to take over a country?
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM
	        1328 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
			why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM
	        369 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Yeah that's why i don't want us to take over. I think the US is already too big as is *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 04:37:41 PM
	        345 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
			One might argue it already is. The other way around too, though. *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 04:44:19 PM
	        329 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 04:51:38 PM
	        890 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 05:11:49 PM
	        732 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
			Actually, make that number 120 to 150. *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 05:14:15 PM
	        344 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			We don't invade countries we can't locate on the map...
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:01:43 PM
	        981 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?  - 16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
	        683 Views
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
	        683 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
	        683 Views
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
	        683 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			Re: So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?  - 16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
	        911 Views
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
	        911 Views
	        
	    
	
	     - 16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
	        911 Views
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
	        911 Views
	        
	    
			When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM
	        857 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			I agree we should attack Canada instead
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM
	        848 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Yeah, but they don't gouge us for the oil, cost the same as anyone else *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 05:49:38 PM
	        351 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico.
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM
	        923 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
		
			"I would stop doing a bad thing 10 times over before I did a worse thing"? WTF? *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:04:48 PM
	        430 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Read the original post.  He proposes annexing Mexico due to the drug problem.
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:28:54 PM
	        899 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			He's just nitpicking on your phrasing in the subject line. I think. *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:37:17 PM
	        338 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM
	        352 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Work Visas might help, but...
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM
	        1052 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM
	        787 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page  - 16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
	        727 Views
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
	        727 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	     - 16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
	        727 Views
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
	        727 Views
	        
	
		
	    
			it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans  - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
	        843 Views
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
	        843 Views
	        
	    
	
	     - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
	        843 Views
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
	        843 Views
	        
	    		
			When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM*
		
	         - 16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM
	        354 Views
	        
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM
	        440 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM
	        344 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Really? Why is that? I'm not too terribly familiar with Hitler's reasons for mass genocide *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:30:48 PM
	        351 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
		
	    
			Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM
	        783 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Ok that's what I was thinking
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM
	        826 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM
	        822 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM
	        764 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to...
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM
	        934 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM
	        838 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Ah,
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
	        748 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Nah, more like, I know I shouldn't have done this, but I couldn't resist. *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:07:35 PM
	        363 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me.
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM
	        873 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM
	        820 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:09:16 PM
	        916 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:19:19 PM
	        795 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half?
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM
	        871 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM
	        360 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
	
	    
			yes after a messy political and physical "conflict"
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM
	        837 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			There was also the Gasdsen Purchase
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM
	        793 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware.
	    
	         - 18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM
	        712 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	    
			and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM*
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM
	        384 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			same way  it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
	        660 Views
 it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
	        660 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
	
	     it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
	        660 Views
 it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
	        660 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			my best friend is an illegal and is going back to mexico in a few months
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 11:28:11 PM
	        844 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			every issue is simpler when you don't have faces to represent it for you. *NM*
	    
	         - 16/08/2010 11:29:38 PM
	        355 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM
	        681 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
		
	    
			Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM
	        754 Views
	        
	
		
	    
	
	    
			Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM
	        919 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
			I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM*
	    
	         - 17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM
	        336 Views
	        
	    
	
	    
 
  
  
  
  
  
 