Active Users:590 Time:02/06/2026 01:53:36 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
Really, the entire issue needs one big sit back to see what can and cannot be done to fix it. What really needs to be done is to find a way to make people not want to leave Mexico (but i don't mean "not move to the US";).

And yah, the stupid anchor baby law needs to be changed. It's totally ridiculous from both sides. My uncle was born off-shores during WWII and, according to my grandmother, it was way too much of a fight to get him naturalized (despite the fact both his parents were American and his father was stationed military).
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
At what point does it become ok to take over a country? Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM 1400 Views
why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM* random thoughts - 16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM 397 Views
Yeah that's why i don't want us to take over. I think the US is already too big as is *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 04:37:41 PM 375 Views
One might argue it already is. The other way around too, though. *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 04:44:19 PM 363 Views
Well, generally it's no longer seen as acceptable. Ghavrel - 16/08/2010 04:38:11 PM 1046 Views
Revolución! *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 04:47:55 PM 383 Views
I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride. Legolas - 16/08/2010 04:51:38 PM 958 Views
Re: I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride. snoopcester - 16/08/2010 05:11:49 PM 810 Views
Actually, make that number 120 to 150. *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 05:14:15 PM 375 Views
We don't invade countries we can't locate on the map... Isaac - 16/08/2010 06:01:43 PM 1051 Views
So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself? Legolas - 16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM 750 Views
Re: So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself? Isaac - 16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM 978 Views
Nah, they're willing to switch allegiances at the drop of a hat Brian - 16/08/2010 06:25:29 PM 860 Views
When it spills your pint and eyes up your woman? snoopcester - 16/08/2010 04:53:29 PM 911 Views
When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both Isaac - 16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM 923 Views
I agree we should attack Canada instead random thoughts - 16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM 914 Views
Yeah, but they don't gouge us for the oil, cost the same as anyone else *NM* Isaac - 16/08/2010 05:49:38 PM 376 Views
I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico. Tom - 16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM 999 Views
"I would stop doing a bad thing 10 times over before I did a worse thing"? WTF? *NM* Cannoli - 16/08/2010 06:04:48 PM 458 Views
Read the original post. He proposes annexing Mexico due to the drug problem. Tom - 16/08/2010 06:28:54 PM 964 Views
He's just nitpicking on your phrasing in the subject line. I think. *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 06:37:17 PM 365 Views
that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM* LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM 380 Views
Lol that rates right up there with the bridge to nowhere *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 06:49:19 PM 405 Views
Work Visas might help, but... Isaac - 16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM 1130 Views
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM 859 Views
Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page Isaac - 16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM 805 Views
it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM 908 Views
When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM* Francie - 16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM 385 Views
west point? *NM* jh - 16/08/2010 08:56:58 PM 350 Views
Well take over and intervene are two totally different things Napoleon62 - 16/08/2010 09:00:50 PM 1142 Views
never *NM* Yunalesca - 16/08/2010 09:05:03 PM 390 Views
Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM 474 Views
If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM 373 Views
Really? Why is that? I'm not too terribly familiar with Hitler's reasons for mass genocide *NM* Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 09:30:48 PM 384 Views
Er, not enough Jews to be a problem, to put it crudely. Legolas - 16/08/2010 09:50:41 PM 1004 Views
Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35 Isaac - 16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM 851 Views
Ok that's what I was thinking Dark Knight - 16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM 889 Views
Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating". Legolas - 16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM 891 Views
Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating". Camilla - 16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM 835 Views
I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to... Legolas - 16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM 1004 Views
Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing Legolas - 16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM 906 Views
Ah, snoopcester - 16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM 813 Views
Nah, more like, I know I shouldn't have done this, but I couldn't resist. *NM* Legolas - 16/08/2010 10:07:35 PM 395 Views
I second the motion to invoke Godwin's Law for closure... Isaac - 16/08/2010 10:11:22 PM 946 Views
Perhaps snoopcester - 16/08/2010 09:46:55 PM 807 Views
Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me. Legolas - 16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM 945 Views
The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping Isaac - 16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM 887 Views
I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue. Legolas - 16/08/2010 10:09:16 PM 988 Views
Re: I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue. Isaac - 16/08/2010 10:19:19 PM 860 Views
The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half? Bramhodoulos - 16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM 934 Views
"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM* Isaac - 16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM 388 Views
yes after a messy political and physical "conflict" LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM 906 Views
There was also the Gasdsen Purchase Isaac - 17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM 872 Views
The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware. Joel - 18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM 805 Views
It is fairly large, but yes Isaac - 18/08/2010 02:21:25 PM 850 Views
Well, yes, it WAS a purchase, but then, it would be. Joel - 18/08/2010 03:22:23 PM 1310 Views
and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM* random thoughts - 17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM 416 Views
same way it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it. LadyLorraine - 17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM 732 Views
At least we took the time to conquer it random thoughts - 18/08/2010 05:20:57 PM 1077 Views
well they were not using it *NM* random thoughts - 17/08/2010 01:27:47 AM 368 Views
Once you solved all your own problems, I'm sure. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 16/08/2010 10:58:28 PM 377 Views
my best friend is an illegal and is going back to mexico in a few months Delireus - 16/08/2010 11:28:11 PM 924 Views
every issue is simpler when you don't have faces to represent it for you. *NM* LadyLorraine - 16/08/2010 11:29:38 PM 387 Views
We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. everynametaken - 17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM 754 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. Isaac - 17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM 816 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels. everynametaken - 17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM 988 Views
I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM* damookster - 17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM 369 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes