Active Users:740 Time:05/02/2026 08:39:46 PM
no it's not as simple as "XX" and "XY" LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 12/09/2009 03:02:03 PM
but regardless of the variations, the medical community has defined anyone with a Y chromosome as a male.

So she can be XXXXXXXXXXXY and be considered a male.

But if she's only X, she's female.

I'm just saying the Chromosomes say more than the anatomy in regards to medical gender.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Caster Semenya has male sex organs and no womb or ovaries - 11/09/2009 12:24:30 PM 1783 Views
I think revoking the championship and a ban at this point would be plain wrong - 11/09/2009 02:01:15 PM 966 Views
Well said. - 11/09/2009 02:10:31 PM 959 Views
agreed. *NM* - 11/09/2009 02:36:06 PM 483 Views
I agree. *NM* - 11/09/2009 03:20:05 PM 473 Views
I agree it's not her fault, but she shouldn't keep her championship. - 11/09/2009 03:50:06 PM 939 Views
Possibly a quibble, but just trying to clarify... - 11/09/2009 05:15:52 PM 1043 Views
It makes sense - 13/09/2009 05:04:23 PM 982 Views
I disagree - 11/09/2009 04:09:50 PM 1323 Views
As bad as if feel for the athlete, I agree. *NM* - 11/09/2009 04:46:57 PM 438 Views
To the extent that LadyLorraine means "at this point", I do agree with her... - 11/09/2009 05:03:34 PM 1020 Views
Sounds like she/he is more dude than chick..... - 11/09/2009 02:42:33 PM 1018 Views
not really. it only takes ONE mistake to cause her problems. - 12/09/2009 03:19:06 AM 972 Views
It's not that simple with DNA either. - 12/09/2009 10:38:28 AM 1040 Views
no it's not as simple as "XX" and "XY" - 12/09/2009 03:02:03 PM 978 Views
I think it is a sad story - 11/09/2009 04:34:29 PM 1026 Views
I agree. - 11/09/2009 09:20:35 PM 1069 Views
I like I said, tragic - 11/09/2009 09:34:57 PM 910 Views
I can't believe this whole thing is public - 11/09/2009 07:03:59 PM 1068 Views
That's a good idea! - 11/09/2009 07:17:20 PM 963 Views
Yeah, seems fair. Medal, no record. - 11/09/2009 07:57:38 PM 921 Views
How could she not know something was different? Not developing a period would be a major sign. *NM* - 11/09/2009 09:21:54 PM 447 Views
Not necessarily, depending on the rigors of her athletic training. *NM* - 11/09/2009 09:26:32 PM 422 Views
When do most girls get their first period? Around 12 or 13? - 12/09/2009 07:34:23 AM 906 Views
Yes, but 14 or 15 isn't out of the ordinary *NM* - 12/09/2009 11:23:09 AM 447 Views
I didn't start until I was 17 *NM* - 12/09/2009 03:02:28 PM 409 Views
That is a bit unusual. *shrugs* *NM* - 13/09/2009 01:17:18 AM 461 Views
starting THAT late is, yes - 13/09/2009 04:24:44 AM 1159 Views
There are plenty of runners who do hard training that keeps them from getting a regular period - 11/09/2009 09:29:24 PM 995 Views
I'd say so too. Periods have a lot to do with % body fat. - 12/09/2009 12:28:46 AM 1079 Views
Not at the age when a girl first develops her period. - 12/09/2009 07:36:24 AM 981 Views
You have an odd understanding of what's normal... - 12/09/2009 02:51:37 PM 991 Views
And you are still missing the point. - 13/09/2009 01:18:54 AM 908 Views
And you're missing the point - 13/09/2009 01:39:46 AM 945 Views
What Sareitha said. - 13/09/2009 03:50:05 AM 1087 Views
people develop 30lb tumors and never go to get them checked out - 11/09/2009 09:36:18 PM 1003 Views
Well, now that you put it that way I guess I could see that. *NM* - 12/09/2009 07:37:18 AM 436 Views
Not that rare in athletes. - 12/09/2009 01:06:27 AM 919 Views
like i said in my first post - 12/09/2009 03:25:04 AM 1017 Views
I like that idea. That is the most sensible solution. *NM* - 12/09/2009 01:07:42 AM 405 Views
This whole thing has been handled disgracefully - 12/09/2009 12:37:35 PM 1097 Views
Considering that similar questions have arisen before - 13/09/2009 01:43:18 AM 1152 Views

Reply to Message