Active Users:785 Time:10/12/2025 01:24:58 PM
no it's not as simple as "XX" and "XY" LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 12/09/2009 03:02:03 PM
but regardless of the variations, the medical community has defined anyone with a Y chromosome as a male.

So she can be XXXXXXXXXXXY and be considered a male.

But if she's only X, she's female.

I'm just saying the Chromosomes say more than the anatomy in regards to medical gender.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
Caster Semenya has male sex organs and no womb or ovaries - 11/09/2009 12:24:30 PM 1739 Views
I think revoking the championship and a ban at this point would be plain wrong - 11/09/2009 02:01:15 PM 945 Views
Well said. - 11/09/2009 02:10:31 PM 928 Views
agreed. *NM* - 11/09/2009 02:36:06 PM 475 Views
I agree. *NM* - 11/09/2009 03:20:05 PM 467 Views
I agree it's not her fault, but she shouldn't keep her championship. - 11/09/2009 03:50:06 PM 918 Views
Possibly a quibble, but just trying to clarify... - 11/09/2009 05:15:52 PM 1019 Views
It makes sense - 13/09/2009 05:04:23 PM 957 Views
I disagree - 11/09/2009 04:09:50 PM 1285 Views
As bad as if feel for the athlete, I agree. *NM* - 11/09/2009 04:46:57 PM 431 Views
To the extent that LadyLorraine means "at this point", I do agree with her... - 11/09/2009 05:03:34 PM 998 Views
Sounds like she/he is more dude than chick..... - 11/09/2009 02:42:33 PM 995 Views
not really. it only takes ONE mistake to cause her problems. - 12/09/2009 03:19:06 AM 947 Views
It's not that simple with DNA either. - 12/09/2009 10:38:28 AM 1022 Views
no it's not as simple as "XX" and "XY" - 12/09/2009 03:02:03 PM 957 Views
I think it is a sad story - 11/09/2009 04:34:29 PM 1010 Views
I agree. - 11/09/2009 09:20:35 PM 1045 Views
I like I said, tragic - 11/09/2009 09:34:57 PM 892 Views
I can't believe this whole thing is public - 11/09/2009 07:03:59 PM 1048 Views
That's a good idea! - 11/09/2009 07:17:20 PM 944 Views
Yeah, seems fair. Medal, no record. - 11/09/2009 07:57:38 PM 894 Views
How could she not know something was different? Not developing a period would be a major sign. *NM* - 11/09/2009 09:21:54 PM 442 Views
Not necessarily, depending on the rigors of her athletic training. *NM* - 11/09/2009 09:26:32 PM 414 Views
When do most girls get their first period? Around 12 or 13? - 12/09/2009 07:34:23 AM 887 Views
Yes, but 14 or 15 isn't out of the ordinary *NM* - 12/09/2009 11:23:09 AM 440 Views
I didn't start until I was 17 *NM* - 12/09/2009 03:02:28 PM 402 Views
That is a bit unusual. *shrugs* *NM* - 13/09/2009 01:17:18 AM 450 Views
starting THAT late is, yes - 13/09/2009 04:24:44 AM 1135 Views
There are plenty of runners who do hard training that keeps them from getting a regular period - 11/09/2009 09:29:24 PM 970 Views
I'd say so too. Periods have a lot to do with % body fat. - 12/09/2009 12:28:46 AM 1063 Views
Not at the age when a girl first develops her period. - 12/09/2009 07:36:24 AM 957 Views
You have an odd understanding of what's normal... - 12/09/2009 02:51:37 PM 970 Views
And you are still missing the point. - 13/09/2009 01:18:54 AM 883 Views
And you're missing the point - 13/09/2009 01:39:46 AM 928 Views
What Sareitha said. - 13/09/2009 03:50:05 AM 1067 Views
people develop 30lb tumors and never go to get them checked out - 11/09/2009 09:36:18 PM 984 Views
Well, now that you put it that way I guess I could see that. *NM* - 12/09/2009 07:37:18 AM 427 Views
Not that rare in athletes. - 12/09/2009 01:06:27 AM 896 Views
like i said in my first post - 12/09/2009 03:25:04 AM 994 Views
I like that idea. That is the most sensible solution. *NM* - 12/09/2009 01:07:42 AM 393 Views
This whole thing has been handled disgracefully - 12/09/2009 12:37:35 PM 1075 Views
Considering that similar questions have arisen before - 13/09/2009 01:43:18 AM 1128 Views

Reply to Message