I just want a scanner that works, and is safe. If the backscatter machines qualify, then I wish people would shut up and use them. If they don't, I wish we'd develop something else, because pat-downs seem inherently error prone. With that said, I totally agree with the new more "invasive" pat-down measures. If you have to do a pat-down, (this is the part I don't agree with, but assuming that it's true) it makes no sense to avoid certain areas. If you don't pat the chest or genital areas, that's exactly where weapons will start to be hidden. I don't like pat-downs in general, but what good they're able to accomplish is completely negated by allowing people their modesty.
So. Yes, I support the new pat-down measures until we can confirm the safety of the backscatter machines, or develop a better technology.
So. Yes, I support the new pat-down measures until we can confirm the safety of the backscatter machines, or develop a better technology.
So, people travelling in the US tomorrow: are you opting out?
- 23/11/2010 10:45:03 PM
938 Views
- 23/11/2010 10:45:03 PM
938 Views
Meh.
- 23/11/2010 11:23:17 PM
905 Views
How did the NYTimes phrase this again... oh yes.
- 23/11/2010 11:42:29 PM
912 Views
This article about "Isrealification" is interesting
- 24/11/2010 12:54:59 AM
967 Views
We have that saying here, too.
- 24/11/2010 01:50:03 AM
893 Views
Re: We have that saying here, too.
- 24/11/2010 02:05:09 AM
815 Views
a loaded gun clip was found left on a plane by an off-duty cop just today in fact....
- 24/11/2010 05:06:15 AM
714 Views
You're missing the point
- 24/11/2010 09:48:42 AM
795 Views
The thing about the gun just proves how good the behavioural profiling is.
- 25/11/2010 09:49:55 AM
610 Views
If all goes as they say it does, it sounds like a very good system *NM*
- 24/11/2010 04:23:42 AM
303 Views
No, US air traffic controllers don't go on strike.
- 24/11/2010 01:37:30 AM
818 Views
I've got no problem with the scanners, but people are welcome to object
- 24/11/2010 02:20:25 AM
1033 Views
I see some sheep have replied to your post. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 03:17:00 AM
273 Views
I assume you are less than fond of the situation, then? *NM*
- 24/11/2010 03:25:45 AM
408 Views
You assume correctly.
- 24/11/2010 03:44:23 AM
952 Views
If grandmas aren't getting groped at the airport...
- 24/11/2010 04:38:50 AM
790 Views
just out of curiousity, do either you or litdog have any solutions?
- 24/11/2010 04:59:07 AM
701 Views
Stop adding useless and invasive procedures. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 05:19:23 AM
317 Views
yes that's all well and good.
- 24/11/2010 05:37:01 AM
622 Views
It would be the same as it was before this nonsense. EDITED
- 24/11/2010 06:18:57 AM
858 Views
if that's what your comfortable with, then. Fair enough *NM*
- 24/11/2010 06:22:46 AM
283 Views
Read my edit for what I think is a bit more balanced.
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 06:29:11 AM
271 Views
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 06:29:11 AM
271 Views
Become the enemy and they win, but is this is really a Civil Rights issue?
- 24/11/2010 02:16:43 PM
902 Views
At least have the decency to refer to us as 'sheeple' *NM*
- 24/11/2010 03:39:47 AM
271 Views
You didn't seem to be among the sheep.
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 03:45:06 AM
277 Views
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 03:45:06 AM
277 Views
i will make sure to pat my girlfriend down before we get in the car and start driving
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 05:16:43 AM
272 Views
*NM*
- 24/11/2010 05:16:43 AM
272 Views
Only morons fly in the U.S. on Thanksgiving day. *NM*
- 24/11/2010 05:42:04 PM
369 Views
Here's a report on the scanners, that you might just want to get felt up.
- 24/11/2010 08:56:09 PM
820 Views
I'm half-tempted to engage in some frottage with the girlfriend while waiting in the pat-down line.
- 25/11/2010 03:43:47 AM
666 Views


And yah, it sounds like you're a bit like me.